Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Kadans Vs. Collins

Kadans vs Collins

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jan-31-1972
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/103099

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
404 U.S. 1244
Subject
Election

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Election

Key legal issue
Election

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Kadans

Respondent

Collins

Excerpt

kadans v. collins - 404 u.s. 1244 (1972) u.s. supreme court kadans v. collins, 404 u.s. 1244 (1972) kadans v. collins no. a-784 (7163) decided january 31, 1972 404 u.s. 1244 on application for temporary relief syllabus application for temporary relief allowing petitioner to practice law pending consideration of petition for rehearing by the court denied by justice douglas, because of the nature of the relief requested and because he was not one of the majority who voted to deny the petition for certiorari. see: ante, p. 1007. mr. justice douglas, circuit justice. the petition for certiorari in this case was denied by the court on january 10, 1972, mr. justice brennan and i noting that we voted to grant. ante p. 1007. petitioner now asks me for temporary relief allowing him to practice law pending consideration by the court on a petition for rehearing. the difficulty is that the grant of that relief would in effect be a partial grant of relief sought in the petition for certiorari. i, one of the dissenting justices, am barred by our rule 58(1) from voting on a petition for rehearing, those petitions being considered only by those "who concurred in the judgment or decision." unless one of the majority who voted to deny votes to reopen the case, the dissenters take no part. if one who voted to deny changes his mind and votes to grant the petition, then of course the entire court participates. but in light of this rule and in light of our practice and in consideration of the nature of the relief that is being asked of me, i herewith deny the application.

Full Judgment

Kadans v. Collins - 404 U.S. 1244 (1972)
U.S. Supreme Court Kadans v. Collins, 404 U.S. 1244 (1972)

Kadans v. Collins

No. A-784 (7163)

Decided January 31, 1972

404 U.S. 1244

ON APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RELIEF

SYLLABUS

Application for temporary relief allowing petitioner to practice law pending consideration of petition for rehearing by the Court denied by JUSTICE DOUGLAS, because of the nature of the relief requested and because he was not one of the majority who voted to deny the petition for certiorari.

See: Ante, p. 1007.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, Circuit Justice.

The petition for certiorari in this case was denied by the Court on January 10, 1972, MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN and I noting that we voted to grant. Ante p. 1007.

Petitioner now asks me for temporary relief allowing him to practice law pending consideration by the Court on a petition for rehearing. The difficulty is that the grant of that relief would in effect be a partial grant of relief sought in the petition for certiorari. I, one of the dissenting Justices, am barred by our Rule 58(1) from voting on a petition for rehearing, those petitions being considered only by those "who concurred in the judgment or decision." Unless one of the majority who voted to deny votes to reopen the case, the dissenters take no part. If one who voted to deny changes his mind and votes to grant the petition, then of course the entire Court participates. But in light of this rule and in light of our practice and in consideration of the nature of the relief that is being asked of me, I herewith deny the application.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial