Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Arti Devi Vs. State of Bihar and ors

Arti Devi vs State of Bihar and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided Aug 20, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1028444

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Election

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Election

Key legal issue
Election

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Arti Devi

Respondent

State of Bihar and ors

Excerpt

.....including the order of cognizance dated 19.5.2008 passed by the chief judicial magistrate, gaya in bodhgaya p.s. case no.159 of 2007 (g.r. no.2661 of 2007 trial no.1546 of 2008). the prosecution case is that the petitioner, who was contesting the election of the ward commissioner, was mentioned twice in the electoral roll and hence the present prosecution. the submission of the petitioner is that even if her name found mention at two places, she has not committed any irregularity since she is not the person, who had prepared the roll nor had she in any manner violated the code of the election, which is evident from patna high court cr.misc. no.54719 of 2007 dt.20-08-2013 2 the format of the election form. learned counsel for the election commission submits that since the petitioner’s name was found twice on the electoral roll she should be prosecuted. considering the facts of the case and that the petitioner could not be held liable for the wrong entry in the electoral roll which has no bearing on the entries in the declaration as a candidate for ward commissioner, the application is allowed and the entire proceeding including the order dated 19.5.2008 passed by the chief judicial magistrate, gaya in bodhgaya p.s. case no.159 of 2007 (g.r. no.2661 of 2007 trial no.1546 of 2008) is hereby set aside. (anjana prakash, j) nafr/narendra/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.54719 of 2007 =========================================================== Arti Devi wife of Shri Akhilesh Kumar Singh, Ward Parshad, Ward No.3, Nagar Panchayat Bodhgaya, P.S. Bodhgaya, District Gaya, presently Chairman, Bodhgaya Nagar Panchayat, District Gaya .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Rajya Nirwachan Ayog, Bihar, Patna 3. Zila Nirwachan Padadhikari-sah-Zila Padadhikari, Gaya 4. Sri Navneet Ranjan Tiwari, Nirwachi Padadhikari, Nagar Panchayat Bodhgaya- sah-Anumandal Padadhikari, Sadar, Gaya .... .... Opposite Party/s =========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Indra Deo Prasad, Advocate For the State : Mr. B.P. Singh, A.P.P. For Opposite Party No.2 : Mr. R.S. Pradhan, Sr. Advocate Mr. Rajeev Lochan, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL JUDGMENT

Date:

20. 08-2013 The Petitioner seeks quashing of the entire proceeding including the order of cognizance dated 19.5.2008 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in Bodhgaya P.S. case No.159 of 2007 (G.R. No.2661 of 2007 Trial No.1546 of 2008). The prosecution case is that the Petitioner, who was contesting the election of the Ward Commissioner, was mentioned twice in the electoral roll and hence the present prosecution. The submission of the Petitioner is that even if her name found mention at two places, she has not committed any irregularity since she is not the person, who had prepared the roll nor had she in any manner violated the Code of the election, which is evident from Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54719 of 2007 dt.20-08-2013 2 the format of the election form. Learned Counsel for the Election Commission submits that since the Petitioner’s name was found twice on the electoral roll she should be prosecuted. Considering the facts of the case and that the Petitioner could not be held liable for the wrong entry in the electoral roll which has no bearing on the entries in the declaration as a candidate for Ward Commissioner, the application is allowed and the entire proceeding including the order dated 19.5.2008 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in Bodhgaya P.S. case No.159 of 2007 (G.R. No.2661 of 2007 Trial No.1546 of 2008) is hereby set aside. (Anjana Prakash, J) NAFR/Narendra/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial