Hackney Vs. Machado

Hackney vs Machado

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1970

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/102694

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/102694
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: 1970
Case Number: 397 U.S. 593
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Hackney

Respondent

Machado

Excerpt

hackney v. machado - 397 u.s. 593 (1970) u.s. supreme court hackney v. machado , 397 u.s. 593 (1970) 397 u.s. 593 burton g. hackney, commissioner of public welfare of texas, et al. v. margarita machado et al. no. 553. supreme court of the united states april 20, 1970 crawford c. martin, atty. gen. of texas, nola white, first asst. atty. gen., hawthorne phillips, executive asst. atty. gen., and j. c. davis and john h. banks, asst. attys. gen., for appellants. c. stanley banks, jr., for appellees. per curiam. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the district court for reconsideration in light of goldberg v. kelly, 397 u.s. 254 . the chief justice, mr. justice black, and mr. justice stewart dissent.[ hackney v. machado 397 u.s. 593 (1970) ]

Full Judgment

HACKNEY v. MACHADO - 397 U.S. 593 (1970)
U.S. Supreme Court HACKNEY v. MACHADO , 397 U.S. 593 (1970)

397 U.S. 593

Burton G. HACKNEY, Commissioner of Public Welfare of Texas, et al.
v.
Margarita MACHADO et al.
No. 553.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 20, 1970

Crawford C. Martin, Atty. Gen. of Texas, Nola White, First Asst. Atty. Gen., Hawthorne Phillips, Executive Asst. Atty. Gen., and J. C. Davis and John H. Banks, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellants.

C. Stanley Banks, Jr., for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court for reconsideration in light of Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 .

THE CHIEF JUSTICE, Mr. Justice BLACK, and Mr. Justice STEWART dissent.[ Hackney v. Machado 397 U.S. 593 (1970) ]

Same Parties Hackney vs Machado Same Subject Land Acquisition