Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Wyman Vs. Bowens

Wyman vs Bowens

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Feb-24-1970
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/102648

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
397 U.S. 49
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Wyman

Respondent

Bowens

Excerpt

wyman v. bowens - 397 u.s. 49 (1970) u.s. supreme court wyman v. bowens, 397 u.s. 49 (1970) 397 u.s. 49 wyman, commissioner of social services of new york v. bowens et al. appeal from the united states district courts for the northern district and southern district of new york no. 866. decided february 24, 1970 * [ footnote * ] together with no. 874, lascaris, commissioner of onondaga county department of social services v. bowens et al., on appeal from the united states district court for the northern district of new york. 304 f. supp. 717, affirmed. louis j. lefkowitz, attorney general of new york, samuel a. hirshowitz, first assistant attorney general, and maria l. marcus, assistant attorney general, for appellant in no. 866. leonard c. koldin for appellant in no. 874. sydney m. spector and richard a. ellison for appellees in both cases. per curiam. the motion of the appellees for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. the motions to affirm are granted and the judgments are affirmed. shapiro v. thompson, 394 u.s. 618 (1969). the chief justice, mr. justice black, and mr. justice harlan are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the cases set for oral argument. page 397 u.s. 49, 50

Full Judgment

WYMAN v. BOWENS - 397 U.S. 49 (1970)
U.S. Supreme Court WYMAN v. BOWENS, 397 U.S. 49 (1970) 397 U.S. 49

WYMAN, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SERVICES OF NEW YORK v. BOWENS ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS FOR
THE NORTHERN DISTRICT AND SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK No. 866.
Decided February 24, 1970 *

[ Footnote * ] Together with No. 874, Lascaris, Commissioner of Onondaga County Department of Social Services v. Bowens et al., on appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York.

304 F. Supp. 717, affirmed.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Maria L. Marcus, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant in No. 866. Leonard C. Koldin for appellant in No. 874.

Sydney M. Spector and Richard A. Ellison for appellees in both cases.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of the appellees for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgments are affirmed. Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 (1969).

THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE BLACK, and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the cases set for oral argument.

Page 397 U.S. 49, 50



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial