Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Lee Vs. U.S.

Lee vs U.S.

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1969
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/102472

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
393 U.S. 1053
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Lee

Respondent

U.S.

Excerpt

lee v. u.s. - 393 u.s. 1053 (1969) u.s. supreme court lee v. u.s. , 393 u.s. 1053 (1969) 393 u.s. 1053 ardell lee, etc., et al., petitioners, v. united states. no. 782. supreme court of the united states january 20, 1969 lee s. kreindler and samuel n. hecsh, for petitioners. solicitor general griswold, assistant attorney general weisl, morton hollander and leonard schaitman, for the united states. petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit. denied. mr. justice douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted. mr. justice marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.[ lee v. u.s. 393 u.s. 1053 (1969) ]

Full Judgment

LEE v. U.S. - 393 U.S. 1053 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court LEE v. U.S. , 393 U.S. 1053 (1969)

393 U.S. 1053

Ardell LEE, etc., et al., petitioners,
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 782.

Supreme Court of the United States

January 20, 1969

Lee S. Kreindler and Samuel N. Hecsh, for petitioners.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Weisl, Morton Hollander and Leonard Schaitman, for the United States.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Denied.

Mr. Justice DOUGLAS is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.

Mr. Justice MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.[ Lee v. U.S. 393 U.S. 1053 (1969) ]

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial