Sullivan Vs. U.S.

Sullivan vs U.S.

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1969

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/102470

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/102470
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: 1969
Case Number: 393 U.S. 1012
Subject: Commercial

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Commercial

Key legal issue: Commercial

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sullivan

Respondent

U.S.

Excerpt

sullivan v. u.s. - 393 u.s. 1012 (1969) u.s. supreme court sullivan v. u.s. , 393 u.s. 1012 (1969) 393 u.s. 1012 john l. sullivan, tax commissioner of the state of connecticut, et al., appellants, v. united states et al. no. 610. supreme court of the united states january 13, 1969 robert k. killian, atty. gen. of connecticut, and f. michael ahern, ralph g. murphy and richard a. gitlin, asst. attys. gen., for appellants. solicitor general griswold, for the united states. macdonald gallion, atty. gen., and willard w. livingston, for the state of alabama, as amicus curiae. duke w. dunbar, atty. gen., and aurel m. kelly, asst. atty. gen., for the state of colorado, as amicus curiae. arthur k. bolton, atty. gen., and william l. harper, asst. atty. gen., for the state of georgia, as amicus curiae. john b. breckinridge, atty. gen., and william f. riley, asst. atty. gen., for the state of kentucky, as amicus curiae. page 393 u.s. 1012 , 1013 james s. erwin, atty. gen., and john r. doyle, asst. atty. gen., for the state of maine, as amicus curiae. francis b. burch, atty. gen., and jon. f. oster, asst. atty. gen., for the state of maryland, as amicus curiae. elliot l. richardson, atty. gen., and alan j. dimond, asst. atty. gen ., for the state of massachusetts, as amicus curiae. frank j. kelley, atty. gen., and maurice barbour, asst. atty. gen., for the state of michigan, as amicus curiae. douglas m. head, atty. gen., for the state of minnesota, as amicus curiae. norman h. anderson, atty. gen., and walter w. nowotny, jr., asst. atty. gen., for the state of missouri, as amicus curiae. ralph h. gillan, atty. gen., for the state of nebraska, as amicus curiae. harvey dickerson, atty. gen., for the state of nevada, as amicus curiae. thomas wade bruton, atty. gen., and robert l. gunn, asst. atty. gen., for the state of north carolina, as amicus curiae. william c. sennett

Full Judgment

SULLIVAN v. U.S. - 393 U.S. 1012 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court SULLIVAN v. U.S. , 393 U.S. 1012 (1969)

393 U.S. 1012

John L. SULLIVAN, Tax Commissioner of the State of Connecticut, et al., appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES et al.
No. 610.

Supreme Court of the United States

January 13, 1969

Robert K. Killian, Atty. Gen. of Connecticut, and F. Michael Ahern, Ralph G. Murphy and Richard A. Gitlin, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellants.

Solicitor General Griswold, for the United States.

MacDonald Gallion, Atty. Gen., and Willard W. Livingston, for the State of Alabama, as amicus curiae.

Duke W. Dunbar, Atty. Gen., and Aurel M. Kelly, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State of Colorado, as amicus curiae.

Arthur K. Bolton, Atty. Gen., and William L. Harper, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State of Georgia, as amicus curiae.

John B. Breckinridge, Atty. Gen., and William F. Riley, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State of Kentucky, as amicus curiae.

Page 393 U.S. 1012 , 1013

James S. Erwin, Atty. Gen., and John R. Doyle, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State of Maine, as amicus curiae.

Francis B. Burch, Atty. Gen., and Jon. F. Oster, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State of Maryland, as amicus curiae.

Elliot L. Richardson, Atty. Gen., and Alan J. Dimond, Asst. Atty. Gen ., for the State of Massachusetts, as amicus curiae.

Frank J. Kelley, Atty. Gen., and Maurice Barbour, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State of Michigan, as amicus curiae.

Douglas M. Head, Atty. Gen., for the State of Minnesota, as amicus curiae.

Norman H. Anderson, Atty. Gen., and Walter W. Nowotny, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State of Missouri, as amicus curiae.

Ralph H. Gillan, Atty. Gen., for the State of Nebraska, as amicus curiae.

Harvey Dickerson, Atty. Gen., for the State of Nevada, as amicus curiae.

Thomas Wade Bruton, Atty. Gen., and Robert L. Gunn, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State of North Carolina, as amicus curiae.

William C. Sennett, Atty. Gen., and Edward T. Baker, Deputy Atty. Gen ., for the State of Pennsylvania, as amicus curiae.

Crawford C. Martin, Atty. Gen. of Texas, Nola White, First Asst. Atty. Gen., Kerns B. Taylor, Asst. Atty. Gen., and A. J. Carubbi, Jr., Executive Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State of Texas, as amicus curiae.

Robert Y. Button, Atty. Gen., and M. Harris Parker, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State of Virginia, as amicus curiae.

James Barrett, Atty. Gen., for the State of Wyoming, as amicus curiae.

It this case probable jurisdiction noted and case placed on the summary calendar.

Same Parties Sullivan vs U.S. Same Subject Commercial