Advanced Search Results

Nokia Siemens Networks Private Limited, a Company Incorporated Udner C ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2009(5)ALT377

Telecom Circles and Chennai Telecom District.4. Admittedly the tenders were invited in two bid system i.e., (1) Techno Commercial and (2) Financial. The last date of selling the tender document as extended was 13.6.2008 and the last

Tera Software Ltd. Vs. Director of School Education, Hyderabad, A.P. a ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2002(2)ALD688

opened on the same day at 5 p.m. The bid is in two stages i.e., technical bid and commercial bid. The 1st respondent after opening of the technical bids, evaluates the same with reference to technical qualifications

Chairman, M.P. Electricity Board and ors. Vs. Shiv Narayan and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ElectricityCommercial

Acts : National Labour Relations Act; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(13), 2(15), 2(36) and 28; Evidence Act - Sections 150; North Eastern Hill University Act - Sections 7; Bombay Shops and Establishment Act, 1948 - Sections 2(4); Chartered Accountant Act, 1949; ;Bombay Shops and Commercial Establishment Act, 1048; Constitution of India - Article 19; Foreign Awards Act - Sections 2

Reported in : 2005(4)AWC3639(SC); 100(2005)CLT648(SC); (2006)1GLR387; 2005(4)KLT485(SC); (2006)142PLR468; RLW2005(4)SC2480; (2005)7SCC283

Arijit Pasayat, J.An interesting question is raised in this appeal i.e. whether the legal profession is a commercial activity or is it a trade or business. The Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board (hereinafter referred to as the

M/S Buddha Films Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Prasar Bharati

Court : Delhi

Subject : CommercialArbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9 and 21; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 1, Rule 10 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2;

Reported in : AIR2001Delhi241; 2002(63)DRJ285

2 CPC, the petitioner has sought interim injunction by way of restraining the respondent from super-imposing any Logo, commercial and branded graphics which is not supplied by the petitioner on the telecast of the cricketing match during

D.E. Kasisah Vs. N.T. Engineer and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Commercial

Reported in : AIR1965Mad257

equipment required from the said international Talkie Equipment Co., by entering into a hire purchase agreement with the Commercial Credit Corporation. The plaintiff did not fare well in the business and he was also in arrears to

B.S. Aujla Company Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Kaluram Mahadeo Prosad and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Section 6; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : AIR1983Cal106

defendants in this suit. The defendant No. 1 is the seller, the defendant No. 2 is the United Commercial Bank, Calcutta, which is the paying Bank. The defendant No. 3 is the Insurance Company and defendant No.

Sri. Jogendra Nama and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : BankingCommercial

Acts : Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 - Sections 20 and 45; Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Sections 5, 6 and 21; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reserve Bank of India, the Indian National Congress (Congress-I), hereinafter referred to as 'Congress (I)', and 11 nationalised commercial banks, which are wholly owned by the Central Government and the Tripura Gramin Bank. 2. The Reserve Bank

Kenya Airways, a Company Registered Under Law Regulating Companies in ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9, 86 and 87; Sovereign Acts; Commercial Acts; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1859; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1877 - Sections 433; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1951; Indian Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 617; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 19 and 285; Indian Companies Act, 1978 - Sections 14(2); West Bengal Public (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971

Reported in : AIR1998Bom287; 1998(3)ALLMR282; 1998(3)BomCR562; [1999]96CompCas140(Bom); 1998(2)MhLj668

was delivered. It is only by this decision the Supreme Court has settled the law with regard to commercial transactions. The defendants have, after the said decision was rendered, taken up the present contention. Till the aforesaid

Trishul Industries Vs. the State of Haryana and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Punjab Scheduled Roads and Controlled Areas Restriction of Unregulated Development Act, 1963 - Sections 2(8), 4, 4(1), 5, 6, 7, 8, 8(1), 8(2) and 25; Punjab Scheduled Roads and Controlled Areas Restriction of Unregulated Developments (Haryana Second Amendment) Act, 1996; Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act, 1975 - Sections 2, 3 and 24; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23; Newspaper Employees (Conditions of Service and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1955; Constitution by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978 - Sections 2; Punjab Scheduled Roads and Controlled Areas Restriction of Unregulated Development Rules, 1965 - Rules 26A to 26F, 32 to 37; Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Area Rules, 1976 - Rule 11; Central Inland Water Transport Co

Reported in : (2006)144PLR222

four projects namely Trishul Industry Ltd. R.P. Estate Ltd. Suraj E Chandani and Green View Industries are exclusively commercial projects involving setting up of hotels and a petrol pump. In all such exclusive commercial projects, the department

Dabur India Ltd. Vs. Wipro Limited

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property RightsCommercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 19(1)

Reported in : 129(2006)DLT265; 2006(32)PTC677(Del)

which it has prayed for an injunction restraining the Defendant from telecasting the impugned 'Wipro Sanjivani Honey' TV commercial during the pendency of the suit.2. By an ad interim ex parte order dated 19th January, 2006, the