Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Morgan Vs. Board of Forestry of Oregon

Morgan vs Board of Forestry of Oregon

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Feb-24-1969
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/102426

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
393 U.S. 529
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Morgan

Respondent

Board of Forestry of Oregon

Excerpt

morgan v. board of forestry of oregon - 393 u.s. 529 (1969) u.s. supreme court morgan v. board of forestry of oregon, 393 u.s. 529 (1969) 393 u.s. 529 morgan et al. v. board of forestry of oregon et al. appeal from the supreme court of oregon. no. 632. decided february 24, 1969. 250 ore. 460, 443 p.2d 236, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. ervin w. potter for appellants. robert y. thornton, attorney general of oregon, and thomas c. stacer, assistant attorney general, for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. foran v. weinhoff, 393 u.s. 529 (1969) 393 u.s. 529 (1969) "> u.s. supreme court foran v. weinhoff, 393 u.s. 529 (1969) 393 u.s. 529 foran v. weinhoff et al. appeal from the united states district court for the eastern district of wisconsin. no. 870. decided february 24, 1969. 291 f. supp. 498, appeal dismissed. solicitor general griswold, assistant attorney general weisl, morton hollander, and robert v. zener for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. mr. justice douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. page 393 u.s. 529, 530

Full Judgment

MORGAN v. BOARD OF FORESTRY OF OREGON - 393 U.S. 529 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court MORGAN v. BOARD OF FORESTRY OF OREGON, 393 U.S. 529 (1969) 393 U.S. 529

MORGAN ET AL. v. BOARD OF FORESTRY OF OREGON ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OREGON.
No. 632.
Decided February 24, 1969.

250 Ore. 460, 443 P.2d 236, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Ervin W. Potter for appellants.

Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General of Oregon, and Thomas C. Stacer, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


FORAN v. WEINHOFF, <a href="/102426"> 393 U.S. 529 </a> (1969) 393 U.S. 529 (1969) "> U.S. Supreme Court FORAN v. WEINHOFF, 393 U.S. 529 (1969) 393 U.S. 529

FORAN v. WEINHOFF ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. No. 870.
Decided February 24, 1969.

291 F. Supp. 498, appeal dismissed.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Weisl, Morton Hollander, and Robert V. Zener for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 393 U.S. 529, 530



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial