Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Shaw Vs. Illinois

Shaw vs illinois

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Mar-10-1969
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/102410
CiteSignal

Log in to get a daily email when new judgments cite this order.

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
394 U.S. 214

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Shaw

Respondent

illinois

Bonus Feature

AI Brief & Ask

Part of AI Studio: get a comprehensive 18-section AI Brief and case-scoped chat on this judgment, plus Verdict Lens, Devil's Bench, and DocMind from the AI Studio hub.

Log in to unlock AI Studio

Subscribers get structured AI Briefs and case-scoped chat. Learn more.

Excerpt

shaw v. illinois - 394 u.s. 214 (1969) u.s. supreme court shaw v. illinois, 394 u.s. 214 (1969) 394 u.s. 214 shaw v. illinois. on petition for writ of certiorari to the appellate court of illinois, first district. no. 665, misc. decided march 10, 1969. certiorari granted; 89 ill. app. 2d 285, 233 n. e. 2d 73, vacated and remanded. gerald w. getty and marshall j. hartman for petitioner. william g. clark, attorney general of illinois, and john j. o'toole, assistant attorney general, for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the appellate court of illinois, first district, for further consideration in light of smith v. illinois, 390 u.s. 129 . mr. justice black and mr. justice white are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied. watts v. maryland, 394 u.s. 214 (1969) 394 u.s. 214 (1969) "> u.s. supreme court watts v. maryland, 394 u.s. 214 (1969) 394 u.s. 214 watts v. maryland. appeal from the court of appeals of mary

Full Judgment

SHAW v. ILLINOIS - 394 U.S. 214 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court SHAW v. ILLINOIS, 394 U.S. 214 (1969) 394 U.S. 214

SHAW v. ILLINOIS.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE APPELLATE
COURT OF ILLINOIS, FIRST DISTRICT. No. 665, Misc.
Decided March 10, 1969.

Certiorari granted; 89 Ill. App. 2d 285, 233 N. E. 2d 73, vacated and remanded.

Gerald W. Getty and Marshall J. Hartman for petitioner.

William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, and John J. O'Toole, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, for further consideration in light of Smith v. Illinois, 390 U.S. 129 .

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied.


WATTS v. MARYLAND, <a href="/102410"> 394 U.S. 214 </a> (1969) 394 U.S. 214 (1969) "> U.S. Supreme Court WATTS v. MARYLAND, 394 U.S. 214 (1969) 394 U.S. 214

WATTS v. MARYLAND.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND.
No. 1267, Misc.
Decided March 10, 1969.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 394 U.S. 214, 215




Save Judgments · Add Notes · Store Search Results · Organize Client Files

Start your Free Trial