Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Mcinnis Vs. Ogilvie

Mcinnis vs Ogilvie

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Mar-24-1969
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/102403

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
394 U.S. 322
Subject
FERA

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

FERA

Key legal issue
FERA

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mcinnis

Respondent

Ogilvie

Excerpt

mc innis v. ogilvie - 394 u.s. 322 (1969) u.s. supreme court mc innis v. ogilvie, 394 u.s. 322 (1969) 394 u.s. 322 mc innis et al. v. ogilvie, governor of illinois, et al. appeal from the united states district court for the northern district of illinois. no. 1033. decided march 24, 1969. 293 f. supp. 327, affirmed. stanley a. bass for appellants. william j. scott, attorney general of illinois, and francis t. crowe, assistant attorney general, for appellees. arthur h. dean, louis f. oberdorfer, frederick a. ballard, john b. jones, jr., and william b. beebe for the urban coalition et al. as amici curiae, and joseph l. rauh, jr., john silard, elliott c. lichtman, benjamin v. cohen, j. albert woll, thomas e. harris, john ligtenberg, stephen i. schlossberg, derrick a. bell, jr., and harold w. horowitz for the american federation of labor-congress of industrial organizations et al. as amici curiae. briefs of amici curiae were also filed by san francisco neighborhood legal assistance foundation et al. and by coons et al. per curiam. the motions of urban coalition et al., american federation of labor-congress of industrial organizations et al., john e. coons et al., and san francisco neighborhood legal assistance foundation et al., for leave to file briefs as amici curiae are granted. the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. mr. justice douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument. page 394 u.s. 322, 323

Full Judgment

Mc INNIS v. OGILVIE - 394 U.S. 322 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court Mc INNIS v. OGILVIE, 394 U.S. 322 (1969) 394 U.S. 322

Mc INNIS ET AL. v. OGILVIE, GOVERNOR OF ILLINOIS, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 1033.
Decided March 24, 1969.

293 F. Supp. 327, affirmed.

Stanley A. Bass for appellants.

William J. Scott, Attorney General of Illinois, and Francis T. Crowe, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

Arthur H. Dean, Louis F. Oberdorfer, Frederick A. Ballard, John B. Jones, Jr., and William B. Beebe for the Urban Coalition et al. as amici curiae, and Joseph L. Rauh, Jr., John Silard, Elliott C. Lichtman, Benjamin V. Cohen, J. Albert Woll, Thomas E. Harris, John Ligtenberg, Stephen I. Schlossberg, Derrick A. Bell, Jr., and Harold W. Horowitz for the American Federation of Labor-Congress of Industrial Organizations et al. as amici curiae. Briefs of amici curiae were also filed by San Francisco Neighborhood Legal Assistance Foundation et al. and by Coons et al.

PER CURIAM.

The motions of Urban Coalition et al., American Federation of Labor-Congress of Industrial Organizations et al., John E. Coons et al., and San Francisco Neighborhood Legal Assistance Foundation et al., for leave to file briefs as amici curiae are granted.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.

Page 394 U.S. 322, 323



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial