Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

In Re Gross

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Mar-24-1969
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/102402

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
394 U.S. 321
Subject
Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue
Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re Gross

Excerpt

in re gross - 394 u.s. 321 (1969) u.s. supreme court in re gross, 394 u.s. 321 (1969) 394 u.s. 321 in re gross. appeal from the supreme court of california. no. 1035. decided march 24, 1969. appeal dismissed. burton marks for appellant. roger arnebergh, philip e. grey, and michael t. sauer for the state of california. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. mr. justice douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. federal-bryant mach. v. department of revenue/illinois, 394 u.s. 321 (1969) 394 u.s. 321 (1969) "> u.s. supreme court federal-bryant mach. v. department of revenue/illinois, 394 u.s. 321 (1969) 394 u.s. 321 federal-bryant machinery co. v. department of revenue of illinois. appeal from the supreme court of illinois. no. 1069. decided march 24, 1969. 41 ill. 2d 64, 241 n. e. 2d 857, appeal dismissed. harry h. ruskin for appellant. william j. scott, attorney general of illinois, and francis t. crowe, assistant attorney general, for appellee. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. page 394 u.s. 321, 322

Full Judgment

IN RE GROSS - 394 U.S. 321 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court IN RE GROSS, 394 U.S. 321 (1969) 394 U.S. 321

IN RE GROSS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 1035.
Decided March 24, 1969.

Appeal dismissed.

Burton Marks for appellant.

Roger Arnebergh, Philip E. Grey, and Michael T. Sauer for the State of California.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.


FEDERAL-BRYANT MACH. v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE/ILLINOIS, <a href="/102402"> 394 U.S. 321 </a> (1969) 394 U.S. 321 (1969) "> U.S. Supreme Court FEDERAL-BRYANT MACH. v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE/ILLINOIS, 394 U.S. 321 (1969) 394 U.S. 321

FEDERAL-BRYANT MACHINERY CO. v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF ILLINOIS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 1069.
Decided March 24, 1969.

41 Ill. 2d 64, 241 N. E. 2d 857, appeal dismissed.

Harry H. Ruskin for appellant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General of Illinois, and Francis T. Crowe, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 394 U.S. 321, 322



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial