Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Shaw Vs. California

Shaw vs California

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided May-26-1969
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/102328

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
395 U.S. 211
Subject
Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue
Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Shaw

Respondent

California

Excerpt

shaw v. california - 395 u.s. 211 (1969) u.s. supreme court shaw v. california, 395 u.s. 211 (1969) 395 u.s. 211 shaw v. california. appeal from the court of appeal of california, second appellate district. no. 1245. decided may 26, 1969. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. irving a. kanarek for appellant. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. lopo v. saks fifth avenue, 395 u.s. 211 (1969) 395 u.s. 211 (1969) "> u.s. supreme court lopo v. saks fifth avenue, 395 u.s. 211 (1969) 395 u.s. 211 lopo v. saks fifth avenue. appeal from the court of appeal of california, second appellate district. no. 1257. decided may 26, 1969. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. robert e. dunne for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. page 395 u.s. 211, 212

Full Judgment

SHAW v. CALIFORNIA - 395 U.S. 211 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court SHAW v. CALIFORNIA, 395 U.S. 211 (1969) 395 U.S. 211

SHAW v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT.
No. 1245.
Decided May 26, 1969.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Irving A. Kanarek for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


LOPO v. SAKS FIFTH AVENUE, <a href="/102328"> 395 U.S. 211 </a> (1969) 395 U.S. 211 (1969) "> U.S. Supreme Court LOPO v. SAKS FIFTH AVENUE, 395 U.S. 211 (1969) 395 U.S. 211

LOPO v. SAKS FIFTH AVENUE.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT.
No. 1257.
Decided May 26, 1969.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Robert E. Dunne for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 395 U.S. 211, 212



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial