Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Bisenius Vs. Karns

Bisenius vs Karns

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-16-1969
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/102299

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
395 U.S. 709
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Bisenius

Respondent

Karns

Excerpt

bisenius v. karns - 395 u.s. 709 (1969) u.s. supreme court bisenius v. karns, 395 u.s. 709 (1969) 395 u.s. 709 bisenius v. karns, commissioner of motor vehicles. appeal from the supreme court of wisconsin. no. 1357. decided june 16, 1969. 42 wis. 2d 42, 165 n. w. 2d 377, appeal dismissed. s. a. schapiro for appellant. robert w. warren, attorney general of wisconsin, and albert harriman and robert d. martinson, assistant attorneys general, for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. stanbridge v. new york, 395 u.s. 709 (1969) 395 u.s. 709 (1969) "> u.s. supreme court stanbridge v. new york, 395 u.s. 709 (1969) 395 u.s. 709 stanbridge v. new york. on petition for writ of certiorari to the court of appeals of new york. no. 208, misc. decided june 16, 1969. certiorari granted; 21 n. y. 2d 706, 794; 234 n. e. 2d 698, 235 n. e. 2d 456, vacated and remanded. william cahn for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of bruton v. united states, 391 u.s. 123 . page 395 u.s. 709, 710

Full Judgment

BISENIUS v. KARNS - 395 U.S. 709 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court BISENIUS v. KARNS, 395 U.S. 709 (1969) 395 U.S. 709

BISENIUS v. KARNS, COMMISSIONER OF MOTOR VEHICLES.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN.
No. 1357.
Decided June 16, 1969.

42 Wis. 2d 42, 165 N. W. 2d 377, appeal dismissed.

S. A. Schapiro for appellant.

Robert W. Warren, Attorney General of Wisconsin, and Albert Harriman and Robert D. Martinson, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


STANBRIDGE v. NEW YORK, <a href="/102299"> 395 U.S. 709 </a> (1969) 395 U.S. 709 (1969) "> U.S. Supreme Court STANBRIDGE v. NEW YORK, 395 U.S. 709 (1969) 395 U.S. 709

STANBRIDGE v. NEW YORK.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 208, Misc.
Decided June 16, 1969.

Certiorari granted; 21 N. Y. 2d 706, 794; 234 N. E. 2d 698, 235 N. E. 2d 456, vacated and remanded.

William Cahn for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123 .

Page 395 U.S. 709, 710



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial