Puryear Vs. Hogan

Puryear vs Hogan

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Oct-13-1969

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/102265

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/102265
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Oct-13-1969
Case Number: 396 U.S. 11
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue: Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Puryear

Respondent

Hogan

Excerpt

puryear v. hogan - 396 u.s. 11 (1969) u.s. supreme court puryear v. hogan, 396 u.s. 11 (1969) 396 u.s. 11 puryear v. hogan, district attorney of new york county, et al. appeal from the court of appeals of new york no. 336, misc. decided october 13, 1969 24 n. y. 2d 207, 247 n. e. 2d 260, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. frank s. hogan, pro se, and michael r. juviler for hogan, and louis j. lefkowitz, attorney general of new york, pro se, samuel a. hirshowitz, first assistant attorney general, and maria l. marcus, assistant attorney general, for lefkowitz, appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. page 396 u.s. 11, 12

Full Judgment

PURYEAR v. HOGAN - 396 U.S. 11 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court PURYEAR v. HOGAN, 396 U.S. 11 (1969) 396 U.S. 11

PURYEAR v. HOGAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF NEW YORK COUNTY, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK
No. 336, Misc.
Decided October 13, 1969

24 N. Y. 2d 207, 247 N. E. 2d 260, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Frank S. Hogan, pro se, and Michael R. Juviler for Hogan, and Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, pro se, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Maria L. Marcus, Assistant Attorney General, for Lefkowitz, appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 396 U.S. 11, 12

Same Parties Puryear vs Hogan Same Subject Criminal