Mcmann Vs. Ross

Mcmann vs Ross

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Dec-08-1969

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/102235

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/102235
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Dec-08-1969
Case Number: 396 U.S. 118
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue: Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mcmann

Respondent

Ross

Excerpt

mc mann v. ross - 396 u.s. 118 (1969) u.s. supreme court mc mann v. ross, 396 u.s. 118 (1969) 396 u.s. 118 mc mann, warden, et al. v. ross et al. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the second circuit no. 153. decided december 8, 1969 409 f.2d 1016 , vacated and remanded as to respondent ross. louis j. lefkowitz, attorney general of new york, samuel a. hirshowitz, first assistant attorney general, and lillian z. cohen and brenda soloff, assistant attorneys general, for petitioners. thomas d. barr for respondent ross. frank s. hogan, pro se, and michael r. juviler for the district attorney of new york county as amicus curiae urging reversal. per curiam. upon consideration of the suggestion of mootness by reason of the death of respondent ross the judgment of the court of appeals, as to ross, is vacated and the case as to him is remanded to the united states district court for the eastern district of new york with directions to dismiss the petition for writ of habeas corpus as moot. page 396 u.s. 118, 119

Full Judgment

Mc MANN v. ROSS - 396 U.S. 118 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court Mc MANN v. ROSS, 396 U.S. 118 (1969) 396 U.S. 118

Mc MANN, WARDEN, ET AL. v. ROSS ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
No. 153.
Decided December 8, 1969

409 F.2d 1016 , vacated and remanded as to respondent Ross.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Lillian Z. Cohen and Brenda Soloff, Assistant Attorneys General, for petitioners.

Thomas D. Barr for respondent Ross.

Frank S. Hogan, pro se, and Michael R. Juviler for the District Attorney of New York County as amicus curiae urging reversal.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the suggestion of mootness by reason of the death of respondent Ross the judgment of the Court of Appeals, as to Ross, is vacated and the case as to him is remanded to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York with directions to dismiss the petition for writ of habeas corpus as moot.

Page 396 U.S. 118, 119

Same Parties Mcmann vs Ross Same Subject Criminal