Full Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.P.RAY WEDNESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF JULY 2013 9TH SRAVANA, 1935 WP(C).No. 11125 of 2006 (Y) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- 1. DR.K.M.ABDULLA, S/O.BAPPU MUSLIAR, AGED 5 YEARS, RESIDING AT KADIYARAKATH PUTHUR AMSOM, VADAKARA DESOM, POST NUT STREET, VADAKARA.
2. DR.P. AMINA ABDULLA, D/O.ABDURAHIMANKUTTY, RESIDING AT KADIYARAKATH PUTHUR AMSOM, VADAKARA DESOM, POST NUT STREET, VADAKARA. BY ADVS.SRI.PULIKKOOL ABUBACKER, SRI.ZUBAIR PULIKKOOL. RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE SECRETARY, BUILDING AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION WORKERS, WELFARE BOARD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2. THE ASSISTANT LABOUR OFFICER, KOZHIKODE, (ASSESSING OFFICER UNDER THE BUILDING AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION WORKERS WELFARE CESS ACT), OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT LABOUR OFFICER, CIVIL STATION, KOZHIKODE.
3. THE DISTRICT LABOUR OFFICER, KOZHIKODE (APPELLATE AUTHORITY) UNDER BUILDING AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION WORKERS WELFARE CESS ACT. R1 BY ADV. SRI.ASHIK K.MOHAMED ALI, SC, KB. R2 & R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31-07-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs. WP(C).No. 11125 of 2006 (Y) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- EXT.P1 COPY OF THE NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT DATED 15 06/2004 ISSUED BY ASSESSING AUTHORITY TO THE PETITIONERS. EXT.P2 COPY OF THE OFFICE PROCEEDINGS FROM THE ASSESSING AUTHORITY. EXT.P3 COPY OF THE JUDGMENT
DATED 01 10/2004 IN W.P.(C) NO. 28770/2004 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT. EXT.P4 COPY OF THE DRAFT DATED 08 10/2004 ISSUED FROM VIJAYA BANK IN FAVOUR OF THE SECRETARY OF AN AMOUNT OF Rs.13590/-. EXT.P5 COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 30 12/2005 PASSED BY APPELLATE AUTHORITY. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE. rs. B.P.RAY, J.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C)No.11125 OF 200.- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 31st day of July, 2013 JUDGMENT
None appears. On a reading of the prayer, it appears that the writ petition has become infructuous as the assessment might have been completed in the meantime. Writ petition is closed. B.P.RAY, JUDGE jes