Ambrose Vs. Wells

Ambrose vs Wells

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Dec-08-1969

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/102229

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/102229
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Dec-08-1969
Case Number: 396 U.S. 112
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ambrose

Respondent

Wells

Excerpt

ambrose v. wells - 396 u.s. 112 (1969) u.s. supreme court ambrose v. wells, 396 u.s. 112 (1969) 396 u.s. 112 ambrose et al. v. wells et al. appeal from the united states district court for the southern district of new york no. 580. decided december 8, 1969 appeal dismissed. john m. armentano for appellants. robert b. mckay for wells, and louis j. lefkowitz, attorney general of new york, pro se, and george d. zuckerman, assistant attorney general, for rockefeller et al., appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. gooding v. wilson, 396 u.s. 112 (1969) 396 u.s. 112 (1969) "> u.s. supreme court gooding v. wilson, 396 u.s. 112 (1969) 396 u.s. 112 gooding, warden v. wilson appeal from the united states district court for the northern district of georgia no. 582. decided december 8, 1969 303 f. supp. 952, appeal dismissed. arthur k. bolton, attorney general of georgia, harold n. hill, jr., executive assistant attorney general, marion o. gordon and courtney wilder stanton, assistant attorneys general, and franklin pierce for appellant. per curiam. the motion of the appellee for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. page 396 u.s. 112, 113

Full Judgment

AMBROSE v. WELLS - 396 U.S. 112 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court AMBROSE v. WELLS, 396 U.S. 112 (1969) 396 U.S. 112

AMBROSE ET AL. v. WELLS ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK No. 580.
Decided December 8, 1969

Appeal dismissed.

John M. Armentano for appellants.

Robert B. McKay for Wells, and Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, pro se, and George D. Zuckerman, Assistant Attorney General, for Rockefeller et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

GOODING v. WILSON, <a href="/102229"> 396 U.S. 112 </a> (1969) 396 U.S. 112 (1969) "> U.S. Supreme Court GOODING v. WILSON, 396 U.S. 112 (1969) 396 U.S. 112

GOODING, WARDEN v. WILSON
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
GEORGIA No. 582.
Decided December 8, 1969

303 F. Supp. 952, appeal dismissed.

Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General of Georgia, Harold N. Hill, Jr., Executive Assistant Attorney General, Marion O. Gordon and Courtney Wilder Stanton, Assistant Attorneys General, and Franklin Pierce for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of the appellee for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Page 396 U.S. 112, 113

Same Parties Ambrose vs Wells Same Subject Land Acquisition