Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

White Vs. Butler

White vs Butler

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Dec-31-1969
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/102181
Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
171 U.S. 379
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary — not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

White

Respondent

Butler

Bonus Feature

AI Brief & Ask

Your first-pass case note in minutes - an 18-section AI Brief on this judgment, plus case-scoped chat. Part of AI Studio with Verdict Lens, Devil's Bench, and DocMind.

Try free for 7 days

Credentials emailed - then log in for AI Brief on this judgment. Already have an account? · Learn more

Excerpt

white v. butler - 171 u.s. 379 (1969) u.s. supreme court white v. butler, 171 u.s. 379 (1898) white v. butler nos. 540-541 argued march 21-22, 1898 decided may 81, 1898 171 u.s. 379 appeals from the circuit court of the united states for the district of west virginia syllabus white v. berry, ante, 171 u. s. 366 , affirmed and followed. the case is stated in the opinion. mr. justice harlan delivered the opinion of the court. butler, the appellee in the first of the above cases, was a storekeeper of the united states at the hannis distillery at martinsburg, west virginia. ruckman, the appellee in the second case, was also a storekeeper at the same distillery. the bill in each case is substantially like that in white v. berry, ante, just decided. the relief asked by butler and ruckman is the same as that asked by berry, and the decree rendered in behalf of each was the same as that rendered in berry's case. for the reasons stated in the opinion just delivered in white v. berry, the decree in each of the above cases must be reversed, and the causes remanded, with directi

Full Judgment

White v. Butler - 171 U.S. 379 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court White v. Butler, 171 U.S. 379 (1898)

White v. Butler

Nos. 540-541

Argued March 21-22, 1898

Decided May 81, 1898

171 U.S. 379

APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED

STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA

SYLLABUS

White v. Berry, ante, 171 U. S. 366 , affirmed and followed.

The case is stated in the opinion.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN delivered the opinion of the Court.

Butler, the appellee in the first of the above cases, was a storekeeper of the United States at the Hannis distillery at Martinsburg, West Virginia.

Ruckman, the appellee in the second case, was also a storekeeper at the same distillery.

The bill in each case is substantially like that in White v. Berry, ante, just decided. The relief asked by Butler and Ruckman is the same as that asked by Berry, and the decree rendered in behalf of each was the same as that rendered in Berry's case.

For the reasons stated in the opinion just delivered in White v. Berry, the decree in each of the above cases must be

Reversed, and the causes remanded, with directions to dismiss the bills.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial