Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Argo Vs. Alabama

Argo vs Alabama

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Mar-04-1968
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/102091

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
390 U.S. 198
Subject
Direct Taxation

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Direct Taxation

Key legal issue
Direct Taxation

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Argo

Respondent

Alabama

Excerpt

argo v. alabama - 390 u.s. 198 (1968) u.s. supreme court argo v. alabama, 390 u.s. 198 (1968) 390 u.s. 198 argo v. alabama. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of alabama. no. 121, misc. decided march 4, 1968. certiorari granted; 280 ala. 707, 195 so.2d 819, vacated and remanded. macdonald gallion, attorney general of alabama, and john c. tyson iii, assistant attorney general, for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the supreme court of alabama for further consideration in light of long v. district court of iowa, 385 u.s. 192 . robison v. united states, 390 u.s. 198 (1968) 390 u.s. 198 (1968) "> u.s. supreme court robison v. united states, 390 u.s. 198 (1968) 390 u.s. 198 robison v. united states. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit. no. 451, misc. decided march 4, 1968. certiorari granted; 379 f.2d 338 , vacated and remanded. solicitor general griswold for the united states. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. in light of the representations of the solicitor general and our own independent consideration of the entire record, the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the district court for the northern district of california for further consideration. page 390 u.s. 198, 199

Full Judgment

ARGO v. ALABAMA - 390 U.S. 198 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court ARGO v. ALABAMA, 390 U.S. 198 (1968) 390 U.S. 198

ARGO v. ALABAMA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA.
No. 121, Misc.
Decided March 4, 1968.

Certiorari granted; 280 Ala. 707, 195 So.2d 819, vacated and remanded.

MacDonald Gallion, Attorney General of Alabama, and John C. Tyson III, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Alabama for further consideration in light of Long v. District Court of Iowa, 385 U.S. 192 .


ROBISON v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/102091"> 390 U.S. 198 </a> (1968) 390 U.S. 198 (1968) "> U.S. Supreme Court ROBISON v. UNITED STATES, 390 U.S. 198 (1968) 390 U.S. 198

ROBISON v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 451, Misc.
Decided March 4, 1968.

Certiorari granted; 379 F.2d 338 , vacated and remanded.

Solicitor General Griswold for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. In light of the representations of the Solicitor General and our own independent consideration of the entire record, the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court for the Northern District of California for further consideration.

Page 390 U.S. 198, 199



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial