Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Reed Enterprises Vs. Clark

Reed Enterprises vs Clark

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Mar-25-1968
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/102062

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
390 U.S. 457
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Reed Enterprises

Respondent

Clark

Excerpt

reed enterprises v. clark - 390 u.s. 457 (1968) u.s. supreme court reed enterprises v. clark, 390 u.s. 457 (1968) 390 u.s. 457 reed enterprises et al. v. clark, attorney general, et al. appeal from the united states district court for the district of columbia. no. 1092. decided march 25, 1968. 278 f. supp. 372, affirmed. stanley fleishman, david rein and sam rosenwein for appellants. solicitor general griswold, assistant attorney general vinson and philip r. monahan for appellees. per curiam. the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. mr. justice black and mr. justice douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument. mr. justice marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. ortega v. michigan, 390 u.s. 457 (1968) 390 u.s. 457 (1968) "> u.s. supreme court ortega v. michigan, 390 u.s. 457 (1968) 390 u.s. 457 ortega v. michigan. appeal from the supreme court of michigan. no. 1163, misc. decided march 25, 1968. appeal dismissed. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. page 390 u.s. 457, 458

Full Judgment

REED ENTERPRISES v. CLARK - 390 U.S. 457 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court REED ENTERPRISES v. CLARK, 390 U.S. 457 (1968) 390 U.S. 457

REED ENTERPRISES ET AL. v. CLARK, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
No. 1092.
Decided March 25, 1968.

278 F. Supp. 372, affirmed.

Stanley Fleishman, David Rein and Sam Rosenwein for appellants.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Philip R. Monahan for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.

MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


ORTEGA v. MICHIGAN, <a href="/102062"> 390 U.S. 457 </a> (1968) 390 U.S. 457 (1968) "> U.S. Supreme Court ORTEGA v. MICHIGAN, 390 U.S. 457 (1968) 390 U.S. 457

ORTEGA v. MICHIGAN.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN.
No. 1163, Misc.
Decided March 25, 1968.

Appeal dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 390 U.S. 457, 458



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial