Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Anderson Vs. Johnson

Anderson vs Johnson

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Mar-25-1968
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/102061

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
390 U.S. 456
Subject
Contract

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Contract

Key legal issue
Contract

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Anderson

Respondent

Johnson

Excerpt

anderson v. johnson - 390 u.s. 456 (1968) u.s. supreme court anderson v. johnson, 390 u.s. 456 (1968) 390 u.s. 456 anderson v. johnson, warden. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the sixth circuit. no. 700. argued march 6, 1968. decided march 25, 1968. 371 f.2d 84 , judgment remains in effect. j. brad reed argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. ed r. davies argued the cause for respondent. with him on the brief was george f. mccanless, attorney general of tennessee. per curiam. four members of the court would reverse. four members of the court would dismiss the writ as improvidently granted. consequently, the judgment of the united states court of appeals for the sixth circuit remains in effect. mr. justice marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. page 390 u.s. 456, 457

Full Judgment

ANDERSON v. JOHNSON - 390 U.S. 456 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court ANDERSON v. JOHNSON, 390 U.S. 456 (1968) 390 U.S. 456

ANDERSON v. JOHNSON, WARDEN.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT.
No. 700.
Argued March 6, 1968.
Decided March 25, 1968.

371 F.2d 84 , judgment remains in effect.

J. Brad Reed argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.

Ed R. Davies argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was George F. McCanless, Attorney General of Tennessee.

PER CURIAM.

Four members of the Court would reverse. Four members of the Court would dismiss the writ as improvidently granted. Consequently, the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit remains in effect.

MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 390 U.S. 456, 457



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial