Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Scafati Vs. Greenfield

Scafati vs Greenfield

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Apr-22-1968
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/102036

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
390 U.S. 713
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Scafati

Respondent

Greenfield

Excerpt

scafati v. greenfield - 390 u.s. 713 (1968) u.s. supreme court scafati v. greenfield, 390 u.s. 713 (1968) 390 u.s. 713 scafati, correctional superintendent v. greenfield. appeal from the united states district court for the district of massachusetts. no. 1104. decided april 22, 1968. 277 f. supp. 644, affirmed. elliot l. richardson, attorney general of massachusetts, willie j. davis and howard m. miller, assistant attorneys general, and richard l. levine, deputy assistant attorney general, for appellant. per curiam. the motion of appellee for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. mr. justice harlan and mr. justice white would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for oral argument. till v. new mexico, 390 u.s. 713 (1968) 390 u.s. 713 (1968) "> u.s. supreme court till v. new mexico, 390 u.s. 713 (1968) 390 u.s. 713 till v. new mexico. appeal from the supreme court of new mexico. no. 1189, misc. decided april 22, 1968. 78 n. m. 255, 430 p.2d 752, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. gladys towles root for appellant. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. page 390 u.s. 713, 714

Full Judgment

SCAFATI v. GREENFIELD - 390 U.S. 713 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court SCAFATI v. GREENFIELD, 390 U.S. 713 (1968) 390 U.S. 713

SCAFATI, CORRECTIONAL SUPERINTENDENT v. GREENFIELD.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
MASSACHUSETTS. No. 1104.
Decided April 22, 1968.

277 F. Supp. 644, affirmed.

Elliot L. Richardson, Attorney General of Massachusetts, Willie J. Davis and Howard M. Miller, Assistant Attorneys General, and Richard L. Levine, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of appellee for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for oral argument.


TILL v. NEW MEXICO, <a href="/102036"> 390 U.S. 713 </a> (1968) 390 U.S. 713 (1968) "> U.S. Supreme Court TILL v. NEW MEXICO, 390 U.S. 713 (1968) 390 U.S. 713

TILL v. NEW MEXICO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO.
No. 1189, Misc.
Decided April 22, 1968.

78 N. M. 255, 430 P.2d 752, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Gladys Towles Root for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 390 U.S. 713, 714



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial