Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Seferi Vs. Ives

Seferi vs ives

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided May-20-1968
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/102012

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
391 U.S. 359
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Seferi

Respondent

ives

Excerpt

seferi v. ives - 391 u.s. 359 (1968) u.s. supreme court seferi v. ives, 391 u.s. 359 (1968) 391 u.s. 359 seferi et al. v. ives, state highway commissioner. appeal from the supreme court of connecticut. no. 1241. decided may 20, 1968. 155 conn. 580, 236 a. 2d 83, appeal dismissed. albert l. coles for appellants. robert k. killian, attorney general of connecticut, and jack rubin and clement j. kichuk, assistant attorneys general, for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. north american van lines, inc. v. united states, 391 u.s. 359 (1968) 391 u.s. 359 (1968) "> u.s. supreme court north american van lines, inc. v. united states, 391 u.s. 359 (1968) 391 u.s. 359 north american van lines, inc. v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the northern district of indiana. no. 1295. decided may 20, 1968. 277 f. supp. 741, affirmed. martin a. weissert for appellant. solicitor general griswold, assistant attorney general turner, robert w. ginnane, and betty jo christian for the united states et al., and alan f. wohlstetter for smyth overseas van lines, inc., et al., appellees. per curiam. the motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. page 391 u.s. 359, 360

Full Judgment

SEFERI v. IVES - 391 U.S. 359 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court SEFERI v. IVES, 391 U.S. 359 (1968) 391 U.S. 359

SEFERI ET AL. v. IVES, STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSIONER.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT.
No. 1241.
Decided May 20, 1968.

155 Conn. 580, 236 A. 2d 83, appeal dismissed.

Albert L. Coles for appellants.

Robert K. Killian, Attorney General of Connecticut, and Jack Rubin and Clement J. Kichuk, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


NORTH AMERICAN VAN LINES, INC. v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/102012"> 391 U.S. 359 </a> (1968) 391 U.S. 359 (1968) "> U.S. Supreme Court NORTH AMERICAN VAN LINES, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 391 U.S. 359 (1968) 391 U.S. 359

NORTH AMERICAN VAN LINES, INC. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN
DISTRICT OF INDIANA. No. 1295.
Decided May 20, 1968.

277 F. Supp. 741, affirmed.

Martin A. Weissert for appellant.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert W. Ginnane, and Betty Jo Christian for the United States et al., and Alan F. Wohlstetter for Smyth Overseas Van Lines, Inc., et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 391 U.S. 359, 360



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial