Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Mccarty Vs. Kansas

Mccarty vs Kansas

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-10-1968
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101965

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
392 U.S. 308
Subject
Contract

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Contract

Key legal issue
Contract

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mccarty

Respondent

Kansas

Excerpt

mc carty v. kansas - 392 u.s. 308 (1968) u.s. supreme court mc carty v. kansas, 392 u.s. 308 (1968) 392 u.s. 308 mc carty et al. v. kansas. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of kansas. no. 548, misc. decided june 10, 1968. 199 kan. 116, 427 p.2d 616; certiorari granted with respect to petitioner boyd, judgment vacated and remanded; certiorari denied with respect to petitioner mccarty. robert c. londerholm, attorney general of kansas, and j. richard foth, richard e. oxandale, and daniel d. metz, assistant attorneys general, for respondent. per curiam. the motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted with respect to petitioner boyd. the judgment of the kansas supreme court is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of bruton v. united states, 391 u.s. 123 . see roberts v. russell, ante, p. 293. the petition for a writ of certiorari with respect to petitioner mccarty is denied. mr. justice harlan and mr. justice white dissent for the reasons stated in mr. justice white's dissenting opinion in bruton v. united states, 391 u.s. 123, 138 (1968). page 392 u.s. 308, 309

Full Judgment

Mc CARTY v. KANSAS - 392 U.S. 308 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court Mc CARTY v. KANSAS, 392 U.S. 308 (1968) 392 U.S. 308

Mc CARTY ET AL. v. KANSAS.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS.
No. 548, Misc.
Decided June 10, 1968.

199 Kan. 116, 427 P.2d 616; certiorari granted with respect to petitioner Boyd, judgment vacated and remanded; certiorari denied with respect to petitioner McCarty.

Robert C. Londerholm, Attorney General of Kansas, and J. Richard Foth, Richard E. Oxandale, and Daniel D. Metz, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted with respect to petitioner Boyd. The judgment of the Kansas Supreme Court is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123 . See Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293. The petition for a writ of certiorari with respect to petitioner McCarty is denied.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissent for the reasons stated in MR. JUSTICE WHITE'S dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 138 (1968).

Page 392 U.S. 308, 309



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial