Pickens Vs. Oliver

Pickens vs Oliver

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-10-1968

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101957

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/101957
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Jun-10-1968
Case Number: 392 U.S. 300
Subject: MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue: MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Pickens

Respondent

Oliver

Excerpt

pickens v. oliver - 392 u.s. 300 (1968) u.s. supreme court pickens v. oliver, 392 u.s. 300 (1968) 392 u.s. 300 pickens v. oliver, warden. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of california. no. 1076. decided june 10, 1968. certiorari granted; vacated and remanded. george t. davis for petitioner. thomas c. lynch, attorney general of california, albert w. harris, jr., assistant attorney general, and derald e. granberg, deputy attorney general, for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed further in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment of the supreme court of california is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of bruton v. united states, 391 u.s. 123 . see roberts v. russell, ante, p. 293. mr. justice harlan and mr. justice white dissent for the reasons stated in mr. justice white's dissenting opinion in bruton v. united states, 391 u.s. 123, 138 (1968). page 392 u.s. 300, 301

Full Judgment

PICKENS v. OLIVER - 392 U.S. 300 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court PICKENS v. OLIVER, 392 U.S. 300 (1968) 392 U.S. 300

PICKENS v. OLIVER, WARDEN.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 1076.
Decided June 10, 1968.

Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.

George T. Davis for petitioner.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Albert W. Harris, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, and Derald E. Granberg, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed further in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of California is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123 . See Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissent for the reasons stated in MR. JUSTICE WHITE'S dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 138 (1968).

Page 392 U.S. 300, 301

Same Parties Pickens vs Oliver Same Subject MRTP