Robinson Vs. Tennessee

Robinson vs Tennessee

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-17-1968

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101938

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/101938
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Jun-17-1968
Case Number: 392 U.S. 666
Subject: MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue: MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Robinson

Respondent

Tennessee

Excerpt

robinson v. tennessee - 392 u.s. 666 (1968) u.s. supreme court robinson v. tennessee, 392 u.s. 666 (1968) 392 u.s. 666 robinson v. tennessee. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of tennessee. no. 1625, misc. decided june 17, 1968. certiorari granted; reversed. jack greenberg, michael meltsner, and anthony g. amsterdam for petitioner. george f. mccanless, attorney general of tennessee, and thomas e. fox, deputy attorney general, for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is reversed. miranda v. arizona, 384 u.s. 436 ; darwin v. connecticut, 391 u.s. 346 , at 350 (concurring opinion of mr. justice harlan). mr. justice black and mr. justice white are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied. page 392 u.s. 666, 667

Full Judgment

ROBINSON v. TENNESSEE - 392 U.S. 666 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court ROBINSON v. TENNESSEE, 392 U.S. 666 (1968) 392 U.S. 666

ROBINSON v. TENNESSEE.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE.
No. 1625, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1968.

Certiorari granted; reversed.

Jack Greenberg, Michael Meltsner, and Anthony G. Amsterdam for petitioner.

George F. McCanless, Attorney General of Tennessee, and Thomas E. Fox, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 ; Darwin v. Connecticut, 391 U.S. 346 , at 350 (concurring opinion of MR. JUSTICE HARLAN).

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied.

Page 392 U.S. 666, 667

Same Parties Robinson vs Tennessee Same Subject MRTP