Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Hopper Vs. Louisiana

Hopper vs Louisiana

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-17-1968
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101930

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
392 U.S. 658
Subject
Contract

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Contract

Key legal issue
Contract

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Hopper

Respondent

Louisiana

Excerpt

hopper v. louisiana - 392 u.s. 658 (1968) u.s. supreme court hopper v. louisiana, 392 u.s. 658 (1968) 392 u.s. 658 hopper et al. v. louisiana. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of louisiana. no. 1291. decided june 17, 1968. certiorari granted; 251 la. 77, 203 so.2d 222, vacated and remanded. camille f. gravel, jr., for petitioners. jack p. f. gremillion, attorney general of louisiana, william p. schuler, second assistant attorney general, harry h. howard, assistant attorney general, and lawrence l. mcnamara for respondent. per curiam. the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is vacated. the case is remanded to the supreme court of louisiana for further consideration in light of bruton v. united states, 391 u.s. 123 , and roberts v. russell, ante, p. 293. mr. justice black dissents. mr. justice harlan and mr. justice white dissent for the reasons stated in mr. justice white's dissenting opinion in bruton v. united states, 391 u.s. 123, 138 (1968). page 392 u.s. 658, 659

Full Judgment

HOPPER v. LOUISIANA - 392 U.S. 658 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court HOPPER v. LOUISIANA, 392 U.S. 658 (1968) 392 U.S. 658

HOPPER ET AL. v. LOUISIANA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA.
No. 1291.
Decided June 17, 1968.

Certiorari granted; 251 La. 77, 203 So.2d 222, vacated and remanded.

Camille F. Gravel, Jr., for petitioners.

Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana, William P. Schuler, Second Assistant Attorney General, Harry H. Howard, Assistant Attorney General, and Lawrence L. McNamara for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is vacated. The case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Louisiana for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123 , and Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK dissents.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissent for the reasons stated in MR. JUSTICE WHITE'S dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 138 (1968).

Page 392 U.S. 658, 659



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial