Streeter Vs. Craven

Streeter vs Craven

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-17-1968

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101922

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/101922
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Jun-17-1968
Case Number: 392 U.S. 650
Subject: Contract

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Contract

Key legal issue: Contract

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Streeter

Respondent

Craven

Excerpt

streeter v. craven - 392 u.s. 650 (1968) u.s. supreme court streeter v. craven, 392 u.s. 650 (1968) 392 u.s. 650 streeter v. craven, warden, et al. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit. no. 830, misc. decided june 17, 1968. certiorari granted; vacated and remanded. thomas c. lynch, attorney general of california, albert w. harris, jr., assistant attorney general, and derald e. granberg, deputy attorney general, for respondents. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit for further consideration in light of peyton v. rowe, 391 u.s. 54 . page 392 u.s. 650, 651

Full Judgment

STREETER v. CRAVEN - 392 U.S. 650 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court STREETER v. CRAVEN, 392 U.S. 650 (1968) 392 U.S. 650

STREETER v. CRAVEN, WARDEN, ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 830, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1968.

Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Albert W. Harris, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, and Derald E. Granberg, Deputy Attorney General, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Peyton v. Rowe, 391 U.S. 54 .

Page 392 U.S. 650, 651

Same Parties Streeter vs Craven Same Subject Contract