Harper Vs. Michigan

Harper vs Michigan

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-17-1968

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101917

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/101917
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Jun-17-1968
Case Number: 392 U.S. 644
Subject: Direct Taxation

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Direct Taxation

Key legal issue: Direct Taxation

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Harper

Respondent

Michigan

Excerpt

harper v. michigan - 392 u.s. 644 (1968) u.s. supreme court harper v. michigan, 392 u.s. 644 (1968) 392 u.s. 644 harper v. michigan. appeal from the supreme court of michigan. no. 1103, misc. decided june 17, 1968. 379 mich. 440, 152 n. w. 2d 645, appeal dismissed. frank j. kelley, attorney general of michigan, robert a. derengoski, solicitor general, and stewart h. freeman, assistant attorney general, for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. carrillo v. craven, 392 u.s. 644 (1968) 392 u.s. 644 (1968) "> u.s. supreme court carrillo v. craven, 392 u.s. 644 (1968) 392 u.s. 644 carrillo v. craven, warden. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit. no. 1201, misc. decided june 17, 1968. certiorari granted; vacated and remanded. thomas c. lynch, attorney general of california, doris h. maier, assistant attorney general, and edsel w. haws and john fourt, deputy attorneys general, for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit for further consideration in light of peyton v. rowe, 391 u.s. 54 . page 392 u.s. 644, 645

Full Judgment

HARPER v. MICHIGAN - 392 U.S. 644 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court HARPER v. MICHIGAN, 392 U.S. 644 (1968) 392 U.S. 644

HARPER v. MICHIGAN.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN.
No. 1103, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1968.

379 Mich. 440, 152 N. W. 2d 645, appeal dismissed.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General of Michigan, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, and Stewart H. Freeman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

CARRILLO v. CRAVEN, <a href="/101917"> 392 U.S. 644 </a> (1968) 392 U.S. 644 (1968) "> U.S. Supreme Court CARRILLO v. CRAVEN, 392 U.S. 644 (1968) 392 U.S. 644

CARRILLO v. CRAVEN, WARDEN.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 1201, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1968.

Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Doris H. Maier, Assistant Attorney General, and Edsel W. Haws and John Fourt, Deputy Attorneys General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Peyton v. Rowe, 391 U.S. 54 .

Page 392 U.S. 644, 645

Same Parties Harper vs Michigan Same Subject Direct Taxation