Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Penjaska Vs. Goodbody and Co.

Penjaska vs Goodbody and Co.

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Oct-14-1968
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101893

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
393 U.S. 16
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Penjaska

Respondent

Goodbody and Co.

Excerpt

penjaska v. goodbody & co. - 393 u.s. 16 (1968) u.s. supreme court penjaska v. goodbody & co., 393 u.s. 16 (1968) 393 u.s. 16 penjaska et al. v. goodbody & co. appeal from the supreme court of michigan. no. 270. decided october 14, 1968. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. bates v. nelson, 393 u.s. 16 (1968) 393 u.s. 16 (1968) "> u.s. supreme court bates v. nelson, 393 u.s. 16 (1968) 393 u.s. 16 bates et al. v. nelson, warden. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit. no. 86, misc. decided october 14, 1968. certiorari granted; 385 f.2d 771 , vacated and remanded. richard gladstein, norman leonard, and ruth jacobs for petitioners. thomas c. lynch, attorney general of california, albert w. harris, jr., assistant attorney general, and charles r. b. kirk, deputy attorney general, for respondent. per curiam. the motions to supplement the petition for a writ of certiorari and for leave to proceed in forma pauperis are granted. the petition for a writ of certiorari is also granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the court of appeals for further consideration in light of burgett v. texas, 389 u.s. 109 ; bruton v. united states, 391 u.s. 123 ; and roberts v. russell, 392 u.s. 293 . page 393 u.s. 16, 17

Full Judgment

PENJASKA v. GOODBODY & CO. - 393 U.S. 16 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court PENJASKA v. GOODBODY & CO., 393 U.S. 16 (1968) 393 U.S. 16

PENJASKA ET AL. v. GOODBODY & CO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN.
No. 270.
Decided October 14, 1968.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


BATES v. NELSON, <a href="/101893"> 393 U.S. 16 </a> (1968) 393 U.S. 16 (1968) "> U.S. Supreme Court BATES v. NELSON, 393 U.S. 16 (1968) 393 U.S. 16

BATES ET AL. v. NELSON, WARDEN.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 86, Misc.
Decided October 14, 1968.

Certiorari granted; 385 F.2d 771 , vacated and remanded.

Richard Gladstein, Norman Leonard, and Ruth Jacobs for petitioners.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Albert W. Harris, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, and Charles R. B. Kirk, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to supplement the petition for a writ of certiorari and for leave to proceed in forma pauperis are granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is also granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of Burgett v. Texas, 389 U.S. 109 ; Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123 ; and Roberts v. Russell, 392 U.S. 293 .

Page 393 U.S. 16, 17



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial