Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Lewinson Vs. Crews

Lewinson vs Crews

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Oct-14-1968
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101890

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
393 U.S. 13
Subject
Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue
Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Lewinson

Respondent

Crews

Excerpt

lewinson v. crews - 393 u.s. 13 (1968) u.s. supreme court lewinson v. crews, 393 u.s. 13 (1968) 393 u.s. 13 lewinson v. crews, county clerk of kings county. appeal from the court of appeals of new york. no. 230. decided october 14, 1968. appeal dismissed. emanuel redfield for appellant. seymour besunder for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. mr. justice douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. estate of burnell v. colorado, 393 u.s. 13 (1968) 393 u.s. 13 (1968) "> u.s. supreme court estate of burnell v. colorado, 393 u.s. 13 (1968) 393 u.s. 13 estate of burnell v. colorado. appeal from the supreme court of colorado. no. 239. decided october 14, 1968. ___ colo. ___, 439 p.2d 38, appeal dismissed. lawrence speiser for appellant. duke w. dunbar, attorney general of colorado, richard d. robb, assistant attorney general, and frank e. hickey, deputy attorney general, for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. mr. justice douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. page 393 u.s. 13, 14

Full Judgment

LEWINSON v. CREWS - 393 U.S. 13 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court LEWINSON v. CREWS, 393 U.S. 13 (1968) 393 U.S. 13

LEWINSON v. CREWS, COUNTY CLERK OF KINGS COUNTY.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 230.
Decided October 14, 1968.

Appeal dismissed.

Emanuel Redfield for appellant.

Seymour Besunder for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.


ESTATE OF BURNELL v. COLORADO, <a href="/101890"> 393 U.S. 13 </a> (1968) 393 U.S. 13 (1968) "> U.S. Supreme Court ESTATE OF BURNELL v. COLORADO, 393 U.S. 13 (1968) 393 U.S. 13

ESTATE OF BURNELL v. COLORADO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO.
No. 239.
Decided October 14, 1968.

___ Colo. ___, 439 P.2d 38, appeal dismissed.

Lawrence Speiser for appellant.

Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General of Colorado, Richard D. Robb, Assistant Attorney General, and Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 393 U.S. 13, 14



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial