Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Biddle, Administratrix Vs. Bowser

Biddle, Administratrix vs Bowser

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Oct-14-1968
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101887

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
393 U.S. 10
Subject
Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue
Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Biddle, Administratrix

Respondent

Bowser

Excerpt

biddle, administratrix v. bowser - 393 u.s. 10 (1968) u.s. supreme court biddle, administratrix v. bowser, 393 u.s. 10 (1968) 393 u.s. 10 biddle, administratrix v. bowser et al. appeal from the supreme court of ohio. no. 159. decided october 14, 1968. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. downey rice for appellant. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. brown v. resor, 393 u.s. 10 (1968) 393 u.s. 10 (1968) "> u.s. supreme court brown v. resor, 393 u.s. 10 (1968) 393 u.s. 10 brown et al. v. resor, secretary of the army. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the fifth circuit. no. 133, misc. decided october 14, 1968. certiorari granted; 388 f.2d 682 , vacated and remanded. charles morgan, jr., morris brown, benjamin e. smith, and melvin l. wulf for petitioners. solicitor general griswold, assistant attorney general vinson, and beatrice rosenberg for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the court of appeals for further consideration in light of carafas v. lavallee, 391 u.s. 234 . page 393 u.s. 10, 11 loptien v. city of sycamore, 393 u.s. 11 (1968) loptien et ux. v. city of sycamore. appeal from the supreme court of illinois. no. 179. decided october 14, 1968. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. william c. murphy for appellee. per curiam. the motion to strike the response to the jurisdictional statement is denied. the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is

Full Judgment

BIDDLE, ADMINISTRATRIX v. BOWSER - 393 U.S. 10 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court BIDDLE, ADMINISTRATRIX v. BOWSER, 393 U.S. 10 (1968) 393 U.S. 10

BIDDLE, ADMINISTRATRIX v. BOWSER ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 159.
Decided October 14, 1968.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Downey Rice for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


BROWN v. RESOR, <a href="/101887"> 393 U.S. 10 </a> (1968) 393 U.S. 10 (1968) "> U.S. Supreme Court BROWN v. RESOR, 393 U.S. 10 (1968) 393 U.S. 10

BROWN ET AL. v. RESOR, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 133, Misc.
Decided October 14, 1968.

Certiorari granted; 388 F.2d 682 , vacated and remanded.

Charles Morgan, Jr., Morris Brown, Benjamin E. Smith, and Melvin L. Wulf for petitioners.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, and Beatrice Rosenberg for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of Carafas v. LaVallee, 391 U.S. 234 .

Page 393 U.S. 10, 11

LOPTIEN v. CITY OF SYCAMORE, 393 U.S. 11 (1968) LOPTIEN ET UX. v. CITY OF SYCAMORE. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS. No. 179. Decided October 14, 1968.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

William C. Murphy for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to strike the response to the jurisdictional statement is denied.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial