Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Bounds, Warden Vs. Crawford

Bounds, Warden vs Crawford

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Oct-21-1968
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101877

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
393 U.S. 76
Subject
Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue
Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Bounds, Warden

Respondent

Crawford

Excerpt

bounds, warden v. crawford - 393 u.s. 76 (1968) u.s. supreme court bounds, warden v. crawford, 393 u.s. 76 (1968) 393 u.s. 76 bounds, warden v. crawford. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the fourth circuit. no. 279. decided october 21, 1968. certiorari granted; 395 f.2d 297 , vacated and remanded. thomas wade bruton, attorney general of north carolina, and andrew a. vanore, jr., for petitioner. per curiam. the motion of the respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the court of appeals for further consideration in light of witherspoon v. illinois, 391 u.s. 510 , and for consideration of the other constitutional questions raised in the case. mr. justice black dissents. in re hagopian, 393 u.s. 76 (1968) 393 u.s. 76 (1968) "> u.s. supreme court in re hagopian, 393 u.s. 76 (1968) 393 u.s. 76 in re hagopian. appeal from the supreme judicial court of massachusetts. no. 352. decided october 21, 1968. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. per curiam. the motion for leave to file an amended jurisdictional statement is granted. the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. page 393 u.s. 76, 77

Full Judgment

BOUNDS, WARDEN v. CRAWFORD - 393 U.S. 76 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court BOUNDS, WARDEN v. CRAWFORD, 393 U.S. 76 (1968) 393 U.S. 76

BOUNDS, WARDEN v. CRAWFORD.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 279.
Decided October 21, 1968.

Certiorari granted; 395 F.2d 297 , vacated and remanded.

Thomas Wade Bruton, Attorney General of North Carolina, and Andrew A. Vanore, Jr., for petitioner.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of the respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510 , and for consideration of the other constitutional questions raised in the case.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK dissents.


IN RE HAGOPIAN, <a href="/101877"> 393 U.S. 76 </a> (1968) 393 U.S. 76 (1968) "> U.S. Supreme Court IN RE HAGOPIAN, 393 U.S. 76 (1968) 393 U.S. 76

IN RE HAGOPIAN.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS.
No. 352.
Decided October 21, 1968.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to file an amended jurisdictional statement is granted. The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 393 U.S. 76, 77



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial