Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Stamler Vs. Willis

Stamler vs Willis

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Nov-25-1968
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101859

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
393 U.S. 217
Subject
Arbitration

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Arbitration

Key legal issue
Arbitration

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Stamler

Respondent

Willis

Excerpt

stamler v. willis - 393 u.s. 217 (1968) u.s. supreme court stamler v. willis, 393 u.s. 217 (1968) 393 u.s. 217 stamler et al. v. willis et al. appeal from the united states district court for the northern district of illinois. no. 478. decided november 25, 1968. * [ footnote * ] together with no. 479, cohen v. willis et al., also on appeal from the same court. 287 f. supp. 734, appeals dismissed. albert e. jenner, jr., thomas p. sullivan, and arthur kinoy for appellants in no. 478. mr. jenner for appellant in no. 479. solicitor general griswold, assistant attorney general yeagley, kevin t. maroney, and lee b. anderson for appellees in both cases. briefs of amici curiae were filed by jack g. day and melvin l. wulf for the american civil liberties union, and by vern countryman, robert f. drinan, clark byse, david f. cavers, george t. frampton, and ira m. heyman for certain law school deans and professors. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeals are dismissed. mr. justice black, mr. justice douglas, and mr. justice harlan are of the opinion that further consideration of the question of jurisdiction should be postponed to the hearing of the cases on the merits and that the cases should be set for oral argument. mr. justice marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases. page 393 u.s. 217, 218

Full Judgment

STAMLER v. WILLIS - 393 U.S. 217 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court STAMLER v. WILLIS, 393 U.S. 217 (1968) 393 U.S. 217

STAMLER ET AL. v. WILLIS ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 478.
Decided November 25, 1968. *

[ Footnote * ] Together with No. 479, Cohen v. Willis et al., also on appeal from the same court.

287 F. Supp. 734, appeals dismissed.

Albert E. Jenner, Jr., Thomas P. Sullivan, and Arthur Kinoy for appellants in No. 478. Mr. Jenner for appellant in No. 479.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Yeagley, Kevin T. Maroney, and Lee B. Anderson for appellees in both cases.

Briefs of amici curiae were filed by Jack G. Day and Melvin L. Wulf for the American Civil Liberties Union, and by Vern Countryman, Robert F. Drinan, Clark Byse, David F. Cavers, George T. Frampton, and Ira M. Heyman for certain law school deans and professors.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeals are dismissed.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN are of the opinion that further consideration of the question of jurisdiction should be postponed to the hearing of the cases on the merits and that the cases should be set for oral argument.

MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

Page 393 U.S. 217, 218



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial