Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Reetha Vs. Charly

Reetha vs Charly

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jul 12, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1018188
CiteSignal

Log in to get a daily email when new judgments cite this order.

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary — not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue
Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Reetha

Respondent

Charly

Bonus Feature

AI Brief & Ask

Your first-pass case note in minutes - an 18-section AI Brief on this judgment, plus case-scoped chat. Part of AI Studio with Verdict Lens, Devil's Bench, and DocMind.

Try free for 7 days

Credentials emailed - then log in for AI Brief on this judgment. Already have an account? · Learn more

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulam present: the honourable mr.justice thottathil b.radhakrishnan & the honourable mr. justice babu mathew p.joseph friday, the 12th day of july 2013 21st ashadha, 1935 rfa.no. 53 of 2003 ( ) ----------------------- against the judgment in os 405/1998 of prl.sub court,thrissur dated 22 11-2002 ----------- appellant/2nd plaintiff in o.s. 405/98 on the file of sub court, thrissur.: ---------- reetha, aged 3 years, d/o.arangassery varghese, parappur desom, tholloor village, thrissur taluk and w/o. cheriyankandath peter, vailathur desom, kallur village, thrissur district. by advs.sri.n.raghuraj smt.k.amminikutty respondents/1st respondent is the defendant in the suit and 2nd respondent is the 1st plaintiff in the suit. : ------------------------------------------- 1. charly, s/o.arangassery varghese, parappur desom, tholoor village, thrissur taluk.2. varghese, s/o.arangassery thoma, parappur desom, tholloor village, thrissur taluk. r1 by adv. sri.p.k.ashokan r1 by adv. sri.m.r.venugopal r1 by adv. smt.dhanya p.ashokan this regular first appeal having been finally heard on 12-07-2013, the court on the same day delivered the following: vk thottath

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BABU MATHEW P.JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF JULY 2013 21ST ASHADHA, 1935 RFA.No. 53 of 2003 ( ) ----------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OS 405/1998 of PRL.SUB COURT,THRISSUR DATED 22 11-2002 ----------- APPELLANT/2ND PLAINTIFF IN O.S. 405/98 ON THE FILE OF SUB COURT, THRISSUR.: ---------- REETHA, AGED 3 YEARS, D/O.ARANGASSERY VARGHESE, PARAPPUR DESOM, THOLLOOR VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK AND W/O. CHERIYANKANDATH PETER, VAILATHUR DESOM, KALLUR VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADVS.SRI.N.RAGHURAJ SMT.K.AMMINIKUTTY RESPONDENTS/1ST RESPONDENT IS THE DEFENDANT IN THE SUIT AND 2ND RESPONDENT IS THE 1ST PLAINTIFF IN THE SUIT. : ------------------------------------------- 1. CHARLY, S/O.ARANGASSERY VARGHESE, PARAPPUR DESOM, THOLOOR VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK.

2. VARGHESE, S/O.ARANGASSERY THOMA, PARAPPUR DESOM, THOLLOOR VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK. R1 BY ADV. SRI.P.K.ASHOKAN R1 BY ADV. SRI.M.R.VENUGOPAL R1 BY ADV. SMT.DHANYA P.ASHOKAN THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12-07-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: VK THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & BABU MATHEW P.JOSEPH, JJ.

------------------------- R.F.A No.53 of 2013 -------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of July, 2013 JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for appellant says that he had issued a notice to his client in the last known address. That has been returned. Defects not cured. Appeal is dismissed for default. Sd/-Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, Judge) (Sd/-Babu Mathew P.Joseph, Judge) ma /True copy/ P.A to Judge 2 3


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial