Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sprowal Vs. New York

Sprowal vs New York

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jan-23-1967
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101788

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
385 U.S. 649
Subject
Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue
Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sprowal

Respondent

New York

Excerpt

sprowal v. new york - 385 u.s. 649 (1967) u.s. supreme court sprowal v. new york, 385 u.s. 649 (1967) 385 u.s. 649 sprowal v. new york. appeal from the court of appeals of new york. no. 825. decided january 23, 1967. appeal dismissed. carl rachlin for appellant. frank s. hogan for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. mr. justice douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. page 385 u.s. 649, 650 fein v. new york, 385 u.s. 649 (1967) 385 u.s. 649 (1967) "> u.s. supreme court fein v. new york, 385 u.s. 649 (1967) 385 u.s. 649 fein v. new york. appeal from the court of appeals of new york. no. 793. decided january 23, 1967. 18 n. y. 2d 162, 219 n. e. 2d 274, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. louis nizer, paul martinson and bennett boskey for appellant. frank s. hogan for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. mr. justice douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Full Judgment

SPROWAL v. NEW YORK - 385 U.S. 649 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court SPROWAL v. NEW YORK, 385 U.S. 649 (1967) 385 U.S. 649

SPROWAL v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 825.
Decided January 23, 1967.

Appeal dismissed.

Carl Rachlin for appellant.

Frank S. Hogan for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 385 U.S. 649, 650


FEIN v. NEW YORK, <a href="/101788"> 385 U.S. 649 </a> (1967) 385 U.S. 649 (1967) "> U.S. Supreme Court FEIN v. NEW YORK, 385 U.S. 649 (1967) 385 U.S. 649

FEIN v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 793.
Decided January 23, 1967.

18 N. Y. 2d 162, 219 N. E. 2d 274, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Louis Nizer, Paul Martinson and Bennett Boskey for appellant.

Frank S. Hogan for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial