Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Zuckerman Vs. Greason

Zuckerman vs Greason

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Feb-13-1967
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101778

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
386 U.S. 15
Subject
MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue
MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Zuckerman

Respondent

Greason

Excerpt

zuckerman v. greason - 386 u.s. 15 (1967) u.s. supreme court reports zuckerman v. greason, 386 u.s. 15 (1967) zuckerman v. greason, 386 u.s. 15 (1967) 386 u.s. 15 zuckerman et al. v. greason. on petition for writ of certiorari to the appellate division of the supreme court of new york, second judicial department. no. 71. decided february 13, 1967. certiorari granted; 23 app. div. 2d 825, 259 n. y. s. 2d 963, vacated and remanded. leonard feldman for petitioners. samuel greason, respondent, pro se. per curiam. the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the appellate division of the supreme court of new york, second judicial department, for reconsideration in light of spevack v. klein, 385 u.s. 511 . mr. justice clark, mr. justice harlan, and mr. justice stewart would affirm the judgment below for the reasons set forth in mr. justice harlan's dissenting opinion in spevack v. klein, 385 u.s., at 520. mr. justice white dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in garrity v. new jersey, and spevack v. klein, 385 u.s., at 530. page 386 u.s. 15, 16

Full Judgment

ZUCKERMAN v. GREASON - 386 U.S. 15 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court Reports ZUCKERMAN v. GREASON, 386 U.S. 15 (1967) ZUCKERMAN v. GREASON, 386 U.S. 15 (1967) 386 U.S. 15

ZUCKERMAN ET AL. v. GREASON.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE SUPREME
COURT OF NEW YORK, SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT. No. 71.
Decided February 13, 1967.

Certiorari granted; 23 App. Div. 2d 825, 259 N. Y. S. 2d 963, vacated and remanded.

Leonard Feldman for petitioners.

Samuel Greason, respondent, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department, for reconsideration in light of Spevack v. Klein, 385 U.S. 511 .

MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, and MR. JUSTICE STEWART would affirm the judgment below for the reasons set forth in MR. JUSTICE HARLAN's dissenting opinion in Spevack v. Klein, 385 U.S., at 520.

MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Garrity v. New Jersey, and Spevack v. Klein, 385 U.S., at 530.

Page 386 U.S. 15, 16



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial