Shaw Vs. California

Shaw vs California

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Mar-13-1967

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101752

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/101752
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Mar-13-1967
Case Number: 386 U.S. 277
Subject: Contract

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Contract

Key legal issue: Contract

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Shaw

Respondent

California

Excerpt

shaw v. california - 386 u.s. 277 (1967) u.s. supreme court reports shaw v. california, 386 u.s. 277 (1967) shaw v. california, 386 u.s. 277 (1967) 386 u.s. 277 shaw v. california. on petition for writ of certiorari to the appellate department of the superior court of california, county of los angeles. no. 52, misc. decided march 13, 1967. certiorari granted; vacated and remanded. valerian j. lavernoich for petitioner. roger arnebergh and philip e. grey for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of chapman v. california, ante, p. 18. mr. justice stewart would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment for the reasons stated in his opinion concurring in the result in chapman v. california, ante, at 42. page 386 u.s. 277, 278

Full Judgment

SHAW v. CALIFORNIA - 386 U.S. 277 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court Reports SHAW v. CALIFORNIA, 386 U.S. 277 (1967) SHAW v. CALIFORNIA, 386 U.S. 277 (1967) 386 U.S. 277

SHAW v. CALIFORNIA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE APPELLATE DEPARTMENT OF THE
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. No. 52, Misc.
Decided March 13, 1967.

Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.

Valerian J. Lavernoich for petitioner.

Roger Arnebergh and Philip E. Grey for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. California, ante, p. 18.

MR. JUSTICE STEWART would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment for the reasons stated in his opinion concurring in the result in Chapman v. California, ante, at 42.

Page 386 U.S. 277, 278

Same Parties Shaw vs California Same Subject Contract