Hollis Vs. California

Hollis vs California

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Mar-13-1967

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101737

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/101737
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Mar-13-1967
Case Number: 386 U.S. 262
Subject: Contract

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Contract

Key legal issue: Contract

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Hollis

Respondent

California

Excerpt

hollis v. california - 386 u.s. 262 (1967) u.s. supreme court reports hollis v. california, 386 u.s. 262 (1967) hollis v. california, 386 u.s. 262 (1967) 386 u.s. 262 hollis v. california. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of california. no. 46, misc. decided march 13, 1967. certiorari granted; vacated and remanded. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of chapman v. california, ante, p. 18. mr. justice stewart would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment for the reasons stated in his opinion concurring in the result in chapman v. california, ante, at 42. page 386 u.s. 262, 263

Full Judgment

HOLLIS v. CALIFORNIA - 386 U.S. 262 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court Reports HOLLIS v. CALIFORNIA, 386 U.S. 262 (1967) HOLLIS v. CALIFORNIA, 386 U.S. 262 (1967) 386 U.S. 262

HOLLIS v. CALIFORNIA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 46, Misc.
Decided March 13, 1967.

Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. California, ante, p. 18.

MR. JUSTICE STEWART would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment for the reasons stated in his opinion concurring in the result in Chapman v. California, ante, at 42.

Page 386 U.S. 262, 263

Same Parties Hollis vs California Same Subject Contract