Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Cepero Vs. Colon

Cepero vs Colon

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided May-29-1967
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101655

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
387 U.S. 425
Subject
Intellectual Property

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Intellectual Property

Key legal issue
Intellectual Property

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Cepero

Respondent

Colon

Excerpt

cepero v. colon - 387 u.s. 425 (1967) u.s. supreme court cepero v. colon, 387 u.s. 425 (1967) 387 u.s. 425 cepero v. colon et al. appeal from the supreme court of puerto rico. no. 1606, misc. decided may 29, 1967. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. markis v. united states, 387 u.s. 425 (1967) 387 u.s. 425 (1967) "> u.s. supreme court markis v. united states, 387 u.s. 425 (1967) 387 u.s. 425 markis v. united states. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the second circuit. no. 43. decided may 29, 1967. * certiorari granted; no. 43, 352 f.2d 860 , no. 64, 353 f.2d 672 , vacated and remanded. [ footnote * ] together with no. 64, moretti v. united states, also on petition for writ of certiorari to the same court. alfred belinkie for petitioner in no. 43. w. paul flynn for petitioner in no. 64. solicitor general marshall, assistant attorney general vinson, beatrice rosenberg and marshall tamor golding for the united states in no. 43. solicitor general marshall for the united states in no. 64. per curiam. the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted, the judgments vacated and the cases remanded to the united states district court for the district of connecticut for a new trial, should the government seek to prosecute petitioners anew. nardone v. united states, 302 u.s. 379 ; nardone v. united states, 308 u.s. 338 . page 387 u.s. 425, 426

Full Judgment

CEPERO v. COLON - 387 U.S. 425 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court CEPERO v. COLON, 387 U.S. 425 (1967) 387 U.S. 425

CEPERO v. COLON ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PUERTO RICO.
No. 1606, Misc.
Decided May 29, 1967.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


MARKIS v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/101655"> 387 U.S. 425 </a> (1967) 387 U.S. 425 (1967) "> U.S. Supreme Court MARKIS v. UNITED STATES, 387 U.S. 425 (1967) 387 U.S. 425

MARKIS v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 43.
Decided May 29, 1967. *

Certiorari granted; No. 43, 352 F.2d 860 , No. 64, 353 F.2d 672 , vacated and remanded.

[ Footnote * ] Together with No. 64, Moretti v. United States, also on petition for writ of certiorari to the same court.

Alfred Belinkie for petitioner in No. 43. W. Paul Flynn for petitioner in No. 64.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Marshall Tamor Golding for the United States in No. 43. Solicitor General Marshall for the United States in No. 64.

PER CURIAM.

The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted, the judgments vacated and the cases remanded to the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut for a new trial, should the Government seek to prosecute petitioners anew. Nardone v. United States, 302 U.S. 379 ; Nardone v. United States, 308 U.S. 338 .

Page 387 U.S. 425, 426



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial