Fox Vs. Oregon

Fox vs Oregon

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-12-1967

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101635

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/101635
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Jun-12-1967
Case Number: 388 U.S. 466
Subject: Contract

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Contract

Key legal issue: Contract

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Fox

Respondent

Oregon

Excerpt

fox v. oregon - 388 u.s. 466 (1967) u.s. supreme court fox v. oregon, 388 u.s. 466 (1967) 388 u.s. 466 fox v. oregon. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of oregon. no. 1421, misc. decided june 12, 1967. certiorari granted; 245 ore. 440, 421 p.2d 977, vacated and remanded. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the supreme court of oregon for further consideration in light of anders v. california, 386 u.s. 738 . mr. justice black, mr. justice harlan, and mr. justice stewart are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied. page 388 u.s. 466, 1

Full Judgment

FOX v. OREGON - 388 U.S. 466 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court FOX v. OREGON, 388 U.S. 466 (1967) 388 U.S. 466

FOX v. OREGON.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF OREGON.
No. 1421, Misc.
Decided June 12, 1967.

Certiorari granted; 245 Ore. 440, 421 P.2d 977, vacated and remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Oregon for further consideration in light of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 .

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, and MR. JUSTICE STEWART are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied.

Page 388 U.S. 466, 1

Same Parties Fox vs Oregon Same Subject Contract