Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Associated Press Vs. Walker

Associated Press vs Walker

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Oct-16-1967
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101580

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
389 U.S. 28
Subject
Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue
Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Associated Press

Respondent

Walker

Excerpt

associated press v. walker - 389 u.s. 28 (1967) u.s. supreme court associated press v. walker, 389 u.s. 28 (1967) 389 u.s. 28 associated press v. walker. on petition for writ of certiorari to the court of appeal of louisiana, second circuit. no. 306. decided october 16, 1967. certiorari granted; 191 so.2d 727, reversed and remanded. william p. rogers, leo p. larkin, jr., stanley godofsky, arthur moynihan, earl t. thomas, john t. guyton and billy r. pesnell for petitioner. w. scott wilkinson and clyde j. watts for respondent. per curiam. the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. the judgment is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with curtis publishing co. v. butts, 388 u.s. 130 . mr. justice black, with whom mr. justice douglas joins, concurs in the result for the reasons stated in mr. justice black's separate opinion in curtis publishing co. v. butts, 388 u.s. 130, 170 . page 389 u.s. 28, 29

Full Judgment

ASSOCIATED PRESS v. WALKER - 389 U.S. 28 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court ASSOCIATED PRESS v. WALKER, 389 U.S. 28 (1967) 389 U.S. 28

ASSOCIATED PRESS v. WALKER.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL OF
LOUISIANA, SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 306.
Decided October 16, 1967.

Certiorari granted; 191 So.2d 727, reversed and remanded.

William P. Rogers, Leo P. Larkin, Jr., Stanley Godofsky, Arthur Moynihan, Earl T. Thomas, John T. Guyton and Billy R. Pesnell for petitioner.

W. Scott Wilkinson and Clyde J. Watts for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts, 388 U.S. 130 .

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, with whom MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS joins, concurs in the result for the reasons stated in MR. JUSTICE BLACK'S separate opinion in Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts, 388 U.S. 130, 170 .

Page 389 U.S. 28, 29



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial