Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Fortson Vs. Morris

Fortson vs Morris

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1966
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101511

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
385 U.S. 955
Subject
Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue
Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Fortson

Respondent

Morris

Excerpt

fortson v. morris - 385 u.s. 955 (1966) u.s. supreme court fortson v. morris , 385 u.s. 955 (1966) 385 u.s. 955 ben w. fortson, secretary of state of state of georgia, appellant, v. john morris et al. supreme court of the united states november 21, 1966 arthur k. bolton, atty. gen. of georgia, g. earnest tidwell, executive asst. atty. gen., harold n. hill, jr., and coy r. johnson, asst. attys. gen., gerald h. cohen and alexander cocalis, deputy asst. attys. gen., for applicant. charles morgan, jr., for morris and others. emmet j. bondurant ii, francis shackelford and randolph w. thrower, for justice and others. a notice of appeal having been filed in the above case from the judgment of the united states district court for the northern district of georgia, and an application for a stay of that judgment pending disposition of the appeal having been presented to mr. justice black, and by him referred to the court under rule 50(6), the stay is granted, pending the issuance of the judgment of this court. all of the parties to the proceeding having requested acceleration of the appeal, the following schedule for further proceedings is adopted: the appellant shall perfect his appeal, file a statement as to jurisdiction, the certified record and his brief on the merits on or before friday, november 25, 1966. the appellees shall file such motions under rule 16(1) as they desire and their briefs on the merits, also on november 25, 1966. reply briefs by all parties may be filed on or before december 2, 1966. the court will hear argument on all matters involved on december 5, 1966. the case will be heard on the typewritten record, but any of the parties may print as appendices to their briefs such portions of the record as they desire. the statement as to jurisdiction, motions and briefs may be submitted in typewritten form and printed copies substituted thereafter.[ fortson v. morris 385 u.s. 955 (1966) ]

Full Judgment

FORTSON v. MORRIS - 385 U.S. 955 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court FORTSON v. MORRIS , 385 U.S. 955 (1966)

385 U.S. 955

Ben W. FORTSON, Secretary of State of State of Georgia, appellant,
v.
John MORRIS et al.

Supreme Court of the United States

November 21, 1966

Arthur K. Bolton, Atty. Gen. of Georgia, G. Earnest Tidwell, Executive Asst. Atty. Gen., Harold N. Hill, Jr., and Coy R. Johnson, Asst. Attys. Gen., Gerald H. Cohen and Alexander Cocalis, Deputy Asst. Attys. Gen., for applicant.

Charles Morgan, Jr., for Morris and others.

Emmet J. Bondurant II, Francis Shackelford and Randolph W. Thrower, for Justice and others.

A notice of appeal having been filed in the above case from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, and an application for a stay of that judgment pending disposition of the appeal having been presented to Mr. Justice Black, and by him referred to the Court under Rule 50(6), the stay is granted, pending the issuance of the judgment of this Court.

All of the parties to the proceeding having requested acceleration of the appeal, the following schedule for further proceedings is adopted: The appellant shall perfect his appeal, file a statement as to jurisdiction, the certified record and his brief on the merits on or before Friday, November 25, 1966. The appellees shall file such motions under Rule 16(1) as they desire and their briefs on the merits, also on November 25, 1966. Reply briefs by all parties may be filed on or before December 2, 1966. The Court will hear argument on all matters involved on December 5, 1966. The case will be heard on the typewritten record, but any of the parties may print as appendices to their briefs such portions of the record as they desire. The statement as to jurisdiction, motions and briefs may be submitted in typewritten form and printed copies substituted thereafter.[ Fortson v. Morris 385 U.S. 955 (1966) ]

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial