Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Lloyd Vs. Brick

Lloyd vs Brick

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jan-17-1966
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101487

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
382 U.S. 366
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Lloyd

Respondent

Brick

Excerpt

lloyd v. brick - 382 u.s. 366 (1966) u.s. supreme court lloyd v. brick, 382 u.s. 366 (1966) 382 u.s. 366 lloyd v. brick et al. appeal from the court of appeals of maryland. no. 679. decided january 17, 1966. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. page 382 u.s. 366, 367 international union, elec., radio v. nat'l labor rel., 382 u.s. 366 (1966) 382 u.s. 366 (1966) "> u.s. supreme court international union, elec., radio v. nat'l labor rel., 382 u.s. 366 (1966) 382 u.s. 366 international union of electrical, radio & machine workers, afl-cio v. national labor relations board et al. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the second circuit. no. 87. decided january 17, 1966. certiorari granted; judgments vacated and remanded. irving abramson, benjamin c. sigal and winn i. newman for petitioner. solicitor general cox, arnold ordman, dominick l. manoli, norton j. come and laurence s. gold for national labor relations board, and david l. benetar and sanford browde for general electric co., respondents. per curiam. the petition for a writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the second circuit is granted, the judgments are vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of automobile workers v. scofield, ante, p. 205.

Full Judgment

LLOYD v. BRICK - 382 U.S. 366 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court LLOYD v. BRICK, 382 U.S. 366 (1966) 382 U.S. 366

LLOYD v. BRICK ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND.
No. 679.
Decided January 17, 1966.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 382 U.S. 366, 367


INTERNATIONAL UNION, ELEC., RADIO v. NAT'L LABOR REL., <a href="/101487"> 382 U.S. 366 </a> (1966) 382 U.S. 366 (1966) "> U.S. Supreme Court INTERNATIONAL UNION, ELEC., RADIO v. NAT'L LABOR REL., 382 U.S. 366 (1966) 382 U.S. 366

INTERNATIONAL UNION OF ELECTRICAL, RADIO & MACHINE WORKERS, AFL-CIO v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 87.
Decided January 17, 1966.

Certiorari granted; judgments vacated and remanded.

Irving Abramson, Benjamin C. Sigal and Winn I. Newman for petitioner.

Solicitor General Cox, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, Norton J. Come and Laurence S. Gold for National Labor Relations Board, and David L. Benetar and Sanford Browde for General Electric Co., respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is granted, the judgments are vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Automobile Workers v. Scofield, ante, p. 205.



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial