Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Cross Vs. California

Cross vs California

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Mar-21-1966
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101439

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
383 U.S. 573
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Cross

Respondent

California

Excerpt

cross v. california - 383 u.s. 573 (1966) u.s. supreme court cross v. california, 383 u.s. 573 (1966) 383 u.s. 573 cross v. california. appeal from the district court of appeal of california, first appellate district. no. 1161, misc. decided march 21, 1966. appeal dismissed. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. motorlease corp. v. united states, 383 u.s. 573 (1966) 383 u.s. 573 (1966) "> u.s. supreme court motorlease corp. v. united states, 383 u.s. 573 (1966) 383 u.s. 573 motorlease corp. v. united states. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the second circuit. no. 24. decided march 21, 1966. certiorari granted; 334 f.2d 617 , reversed. ellis lyons for petitioner. solicitor general cox for the united states. per curiam. the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the united states court of appeals for the second circuit is reversed. fribourg navigation co., inc. v. commissioner of internal revenue, ante, p. 272. mr. justice black, mr. justice clark and mr. justice white dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of mr. justice white in fribourg navigation co., inc. v. commissioner of internal revenue, supra. page 383 u.s. 573, 574

Full Judgment

CROSS v. CALIFORNIA - 383 U.S. 573 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court CROSS v. CALIFORNIA, 383 U.S. 573 (1966) 383 U.S. 573

CROSS v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST
APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 1161, Misc.
Decided March 21, 1966.

Appeal dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


MOTORLEASE CORP. v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/101439"> 383 U.S. 573 </a> (1966) 383 U.S. 573 (1966) "> U.S. Supreme Court MOTORLEASE CORP. v. UNITED STATES, 383 U.S. 573 (1966) 383 U.S. 573

MOTORLEASE CORP. v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 24.
Decided March 21, 1966.

Certiorari granted; 334 F.2d 617 , reversed.

Ellis Lyons for petitioner.

Solicitor General Cox for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is reversed. Fribourg Navigation Co., Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, ante, p. 272.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of MR. JUSTICE WHITE in Fribourg Navigation Co., Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, supra.

Page 383 U.S. 573, 574



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial