Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Selman Vs. Phillips

Selman vs Phillips

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided May-16-1966
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101387

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
384 U.S. 210
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Selman

Respondent

Phillips

Excerpt

selman v. phillips - 384 u.s. 210 (1966) u.s. supreme court selman v. phillips, 384 u.s. 210 (1966) 384 u.s. 210 selman v. phillips et al. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of alaska. no. 854, misc. decided may 16, 1966. certiorari granted; vacated and remanded. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment of the supreme court of alaska is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of armstrong v. manzo, 380 u.s. 545 . page 384 u.s. 210, 211 toombs v. fortson, 384 u.s. 210 (1966) 384 u.s. 210 (1966) "> u.s. supreme court toombs v. fortson, 384 u.s. 210 (1966) 384 u.s. 210 toombs et al. v. fortson, secretary of state of georgia, et al. appeal from the united states district court for the northern district of georgia. no. 1205. decided may 16, 1966. 241 f. supp. 65, affirmed. francis shackelford, edward s. white, emmet j. bondurant ii, israel katz and hamilton lokey for appellants. arthur k. bolton, attorney general of georgia, and e. freeman leverett, assistant attorney general, for appellees. per curiam. the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Full Judgment

SELMAN v. PHILLIPS - 384 U.S. 210 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court SELMAN v. PHILLIPS, 384 U.S. 210 (1966) 384 U.S. 210

SELMAN v. PHILLIPS ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA.
No. 854, Misc.
Decided May 16, 1966.

Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Alaska is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Armstrong v. Manzo, 380 U.S. 545 .

Page 384 U.S. 210, 211


TOOMBS v. FORTSON, <a href="/101387"> 384 U.S. 210 </a> (1966) 384 U.S. 210 (1966) "> U.S. Supreme Court TOOMBS v. FORTSON, 384 U.S. 210 (1966) 384 U.S. 210

TOOMBS ET AL. v. FORTSON, SECRETARY OF STATE OF GEORGIA, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
GEORGIA. No. 1205.
Decided May 16, 1966.

241 F. Supp. 65, affirmed.

Francis Shackelford, Edward S. White, Emmet J. Bondurant II, Israel Katz and Hamilton Lokey for appellants.

Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General of Georgia, and E. Freeman Leverett, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial