Simmons Vs. Seelatsee

Simmons vs Seelatsee

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided May-16-1966

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101386

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/101386
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: May-16-1966
Case Number: 384 U.S. 209
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Simmons

Respondent

Seelatsee

Excerpt

simmons v. seelatsee - 384 u.s. 209 (1966) u.s. supreme court simmons v. seelatsee, 384 u.s. 209 (1966) 384 u.s. 209 simmons et al. v. seelatsee, chairman of the yakima tribal council, et al. appeal from the united states district court for the eastern district of washington. no. 1112. decided may 16, 1966. 244 f. supp. 808, affirmed. l. frederick paul for appellants. james b. hovis for appellees seelatsee et al. solicitor general marshall, assistant attorney general weisl and roger p. marquis for the united states. per curiam. the motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. izzo v. eyman, 384 u.s. 209 (1966) 384 u.s. 209 (1966) "> u.s. supreme court izzo v. eyman, 384 u.s. 209 (1966) 384 u.s. 209 izzo v. eyman, warden. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of arizona. no. 869, misc. decided may 16, 1966. certiorari granted; reversed. petitioner pro se. darrell f. smith, attorney general of arizona, and james s. tegart, assistant attorney general, for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment of the supreme court of arizona is reversed. jackson v. denno, 378 u.s. 368 . page 384 u.s. 209, 210

Full Judgment

SIMMONS v. SEELATSEE - 384 U.S. 209 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court SIMMONS v. SEELATSEE, 384 U.S. 209 (1966) 384 U.S. 209

SIMMONS ET AL. v. SEELATSEE, CHAIRMAN OF THE YAKIMA TRIBAL COUNCIL, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
WASHINGTON. No. 1112.
Decided May 16, 1966.

244 F. Supp. 808, affirmed.

L. Frederick Paul for appellants.

James B. Hovis for appellees Seelatsee et al. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Weisl and Roger P. Marquis for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

IZZO v. EYMAN, <a href="/101386"> 384 U.S. 209 </a> (1966) 384 U.S. 209 (1966) "> U.S. Supreme Court IZZO v. EYMAN, 384 U.S. 209 (1966) 384 U.S. 209

IZZO v. EYMAN, WARDEN.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA.
No. 869, Misc.
Decided May 16, 1966.

Certiorari granted; reversed.

Petitioner pro se.

Darrell F. Smith, Attorney General of Arizona, and James S. Tegart, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Arizona is reversed. Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368 .

Page 384 U.S. 209, 210

Same Parties Simmons vs Seelatsee Same Subject Education