Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Venable Vs. Texas

Venable vs Texas

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided May-23-1966
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101377

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
384 U.S. 266
Subject
Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue
Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Venable

Respondent

Texas

Excerpt

venable v. texas - 384 u.s. 266 (1966) u.s. supreme court venable v. texas, 384 u.s. 266 (1966) 384 u.s. 266 venable v. texas. appeal from the court of criminal appeals of texas. no. 1196. decided may 23, 1966. 397 s. w. 2d 231, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. william vandercreek for appellant. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. page 384 u.s. 266, 267 wylan v. california, 384 u.s. 266 (1966) 384 u.s. 266 (1966) "> u.s. supreme court wylan v. california, 384 u.s. 266 (1966) 384 u.s. 266 wylan v. california. appeal from the appellate department of the superior court of california, county of los angeles. no. 991. decided may 23, 1966. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. ronald h. bonaparte and david a. binder for appellant. byron b. gentry for appellee. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. mr. justice black, mr. justice douglas and mr. justice harlan are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Full Judgment

VENABLE v. TEXAS - 384 U.S. 266 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court VENABLE v. TEXAS, 384 U.S. 266 (1966) 384 U.S. 266

VENABLE v. TEXAS.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS.
No. 1196.
Decided May 23, 1966.

397 S. W. 2d 231, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

William VanDercreek for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 384 U.S. 266, 267


WYLAN v. CALIFORNIA, <a href="/101377"> 384 U.S. 266 </a> (1966) 384 U.S. 266 (1966) "> U.S. Supreme Court WYLAN v. CALIFORNIA, 384 U.S. 266 (1966) 384 U.S. 266

WYLAN v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DEPARTMENT OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA,
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. No. 991.
Decided May 23, 1966.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Ronald H. Bonaparte and David A. Binder for appellant.

Byron B. Gentry for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial