Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Castaldi Vs. United States

Castaldi vs United States

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-20-1966
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101340

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
384 U.S. 886
Subject
Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue
Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Castaldi

Respondent

United States

Excerpt

castaldi v. united states - 384 u.s. 886 (1966) u.s. supreme court castaldi v. united states, 384 u.s. 886 (1966) 384 u.s. 886 castaldi v. united states. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the second circuit. no. 33. decided june 20, 1966. * certiorari granted; no. 33, 338 f.2d 883 ; no. 218, 343 f.2d 548 , vacated and remanded. [ footnote * ] together with no. 218, tramunti v. united states, also on petition for writ of certiorari to the same court. daniel h. greenberg for petitioner in no. 33. philip r. edelbaum for petitioner in no. 218. solicitor general cox, assistant attorney general miller, beatrice rosenberg and richard w. schmude for the united states in no. 33. solicitor general cox, assistant attorney general vinson, beatrice rosenberg and theodore george gilinsky for the united states in no. 218. per curiam. the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. the judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the united states district court for the southern district of new york for further proceedings in the light of shillitani v. united states, ante, p. 364. mr. justice black concurs in the result. mr. justice harlan dissents for the reasons stated in his opinion in cheff v. schnackenberg, ante, at 380. page 384 u.s. 886, 887

Full Judgment

CASTALDI v. UNITED STATES - 384 U.S. 886 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court CASTALDI v. UNITED STATES, 384 U.S. 886 (1966) 384 U.S. 886

CASTALDI v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 33.
Decided June 20, 1966. *

Certiorari granted; No. 33, 338 F.2d 883 ; No. 218, 343 F.2d 548 , vacated and remanded.

[ Footnote * ] Together with No. 218, Tramunti v. United States, also on petition for writ of certiorari to the same court.

Daniel H. Greenberg for petitioner in No. 33. Philip R. Edelbaum for petitioner in No. 218.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Richard W. Schmude for the United States in No. 33. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Theodore George Gilinsky for the United States in No. 218.

PER CURIAM.

The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for further proceedings in the light of Shillitani v. United States, ante, p. 364.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK concurs in the result.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissents for the reasons stated in his opinion in Cheff v. Schnackenberg, ante, at 380.

Page 384 U.S. 886, 887



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial