Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Guy Vs. Tahash

Guy vs Tahash

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Oct-10-1966
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101325

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
385 U.S. 12
Subject
Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue
Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Guy

Respondent

Tahash

Excerpt

guy v. tahash - 385 u.s. 12 (1966) u.s. supreme court guy v. tahash, 385 u.s. 12 (1966) 385 u.s. 12 guy v. tahash, warden, et al. appeal from the united states district court for the district of minnesota. no. 169, misc. decided october 10, 1966. appeal dismissed. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed. page 385 u.s. 12, 13 bookcase, inc. v. leary, 385 u.s. 12 (1966) 385 u.s. 12 (1966) "> u.s. supreme court bookcase, inc. v. leary, 385 u.s. 12 (1966) 385 u.s. 12 bookcase, inc., et al. v. leary, commissioner of police of the city of new york, et al. appeal from the court of appeals of new york. no. 332. decided october 10, 1966. 18 n. y. 2d 71, 218 n. e. 2d 668, appeal dismissed. emanuel redfield and benjamin e. winston for appellants. j. lee rankin and frank s. hogan for appellees. per curiam. the motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question. mr. justice black and mr. justice white are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. mr. justice harlan and mr. justice brennan are of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Full Judgment

GUY v. TAHASH - 385 U.S. 12 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court GUY v. TAHASH, 385 U.S. 12 (1966) 385 U.S. 12

GUY v. TAHASH, WARDEN, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA.
No. 169, Misc.
Decided October 10, 1966.

Appeal dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed.

Page 385 U.S. 12, 13


BOOKCASE, INC. v. LEARY, <a href="/101325"> 385 U.S. 12 </a> (1966) 385 U.S. 12 (1966) "> U.S. Supreme Court BOOKCASE, INC. v. LEARY, 385 U.S. 12 (1966) 385 U.S. 12

BOOKCASE, INC., ET AL. v. LEARY, COMMISSIONER OF POLICE OF THE
CITY OF NEW YORK, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 332.
Decided October 10, 1966.

18 N. Y. 2d 71, 218 N. E. 2d 668, appeal dismissed.

Emanuel Redfield and Benjamin E. Winston for appellants.

J. Lee Rankin and Frank S. Hogan for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN are of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial