Skip to content


Guy Vs. Tahash - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Court

US Supreme Court

Decided On

Case Number

385 U.S. 12

Appellant

Guy

Respondent

Tahash

Excerpt:


guy v. tahash - 385 u.s. 12 (1966) u.s. supreme court guy v. tahash, 385 u.s. 12 (1966) 385 u.s. 12 guy v. tahash, warden, et al. appeal from the united states district court for the district of minnesota. no. 169, misc. decided october 10, 1966. appeal dismissed. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed. page 385 u.s. 12, 13 bookcase, inc. v. leary, 385 u.s. 12 (1966) 385 u.s. 12 (1966) "> u.s. supreme court bookcase, inc. v. leary, 385 u.s. 12 (1966) 385 u.s. 12 bookcase, inc., et al. v. leary, commissioner of police of the city of new york, et al. appeal from the court of appeals of new york. no. 332. decided october 10, 1966. 18 n. y. 2d 71, 218 n. e. 2d 668, appeal dismissed. emanuel redfield and benjamin e. winston for appellants. j. lee rankin and frank s. hogan for appellees. per curiam. the motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question. mr. justice black and mr. justice white are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. mr. justice harlan and mr.

Judgment:


GUY v. TAHASH - 385 U.S. 12 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court GUY v. TAHASH, 385 U.S. 12 (1966) 385 U.S. 12

GUY v. TAHASH, WARDEN, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA.
No. 169, Misc.
Decided October 10, 1966.

Appeal dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed.

Page 385 U.S. 12, 13


BOOKCASE, INC. v. LEARY, <a href="/101325"> 385 U.S. 12 </a> (1966) 385 U.S. 12 (1966) "> U.S. Supreme Court BOOKCASE, INC. v. LEARY, 385 U.S. 12 (1966) 385 U.S. 12

BOOKCASE, INC., ET AL. v. LEARY, COMMISSIONER OF POLICE OF THE
CITY OF NEW YORK, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 332.
Decided October 10, 1966.

18 N. Y. 2d 71, 218 N. E. 2d 668, appeal dismissed.

Emanuel Redfield and Benjamin E. Winston for appellants.

J. Lee Rankin and Frank S. Hogan for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN are of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //